On 4/26/2018 7:23 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:


On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 4:12:41 AM UTC, Brent wrote:



    On 4/25/2018 7:44 PM, agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:


    On Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 2:17:31 AM UTC, Brent wrote:



        On 4/25/2018 6:39 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:

        *On its face it's absurd to think the SoL is invariant for
        all observers regardless of the relative motion of source
        and recipient, but it has testable consequences. The MWI has
        no testable consequences, so it makes no sense to omit this
        key difference in your historical comparisons with other
        apparent absurdities in physics. Moreover when you factor
        into consideration that non locality persists in the many
        worlds postulated -- assuming you accept Bruce's analysis --
        what exactly has been gained by asserting the MWI? Nothing
        as far as I can tell. And the loss is significant as any
        false path would be. AG*

        It's one possible answer to the question of where the
        Heisenberg cut is located (the other is QBism). It led to the
        theory of decoherence and Zurek's theory of quantum Darwinism
        which may explain Born's rule.

        Brent

    *
    I've always found the Heisenberg Cut to be a nebulous concept, a
    kind of hypothetical demarcation between the quantum and
    classical worlds. *

    That's the problem with it; it doesn't have an objective physical
    definition.  Bohr regarded it as a choice in analyzing an
    experiment; you put it where ever was convenient.

    *What kind of boundary are we talking about, and how could the
    MWI shed any light on it, whatever it is? AG *

    In MWI there is no Heisenberg cut; instead there's a splitting of
    worlds which has some objective location in terms of decoherence.

    Brent


The Heisenberg Cut is too vague and ill-defined to shed light on anything, and to say the MWI is helpful is adding another layer of confusion. AG

Decoherence is a specific well-defined physical process and it describes the splitting of worlds.  There is still some question whether it entails the Born rule, but at worst the Born rule remains as a separate axiom.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to