On Sunday, September 30, 2018 at 9:35:18 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 29 Sep 2018, at 13:16, agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > > > On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 10:41:42 AM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 4:48:44 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> * It claims that all mathematical objects exist in "physical" reality, >>> which is sort-of isomorphic or in some sense identical to these objects. >>> That is, no dichotomy between "physical" and mathematical objects, and all >>> the latter including plane waves exist in this reality. But you will never >>> observe a plane wave, so the MUH is falsified. AG * >>> >> >> 1. Tegmark claims everything in the universe is mathematical - that is, >> the universe consists of mathematical objects. >> 2. Tegmark also says that infinities should be eliminated from physics - >> in fact, *infinities are ruining physics*. >> [ >> http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/02/20/infinity-ruining-physics/ >> ]ac >> > > Bruno wrote 1 & 2. AG > >> >> So then via Tegmark there can be no real continuous (infinitely >> divisible) objects like (mathematical) waves, putting 1 and 2 together. >> Only particular mathematical objects exist. >> > > According to Wiki, and what I've heard from its adherents, the MUH posits > that ALL mathematical object or entities exist in nature. But plane waves > do not exist in nature. > > > There is no nature that you can invoke. Once mechanism is assumed, a term > like nature needs to be (re-defined, or explained, without physicalist > assumption, implicit or explicit. > > > > > (Do you know what they are?) So the MUH as claimed by Wiki and its > adherents is falsified. AG > > > I agree with your conclusion, but you assume some nature or matter, which > cannot work in the mechanist context. >
*I didn't assume anything, except that plane waves will never be observed (regardless of your model of external reality) unless you agree to instantaneous action at a distance, and on steroids (!), since as time evolves, the amplitude of a plane wave changes instantaneously in all infinite directions. So I am just asserting that Tegmark's MUH has been falsified since plane waves mathematically exist, but are never reified by whatever is out there -- matter, or nothing but restrictions on motion giving rise the illusion of matter or something solid existing. Incidentally, I don't think the Wiki article refutes Tegmark as you claim; rather it just describes it. AG* > > Bruno > > > > > >> - pt >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com > <javascript:>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
