> On 13 Dec 2018, at 05:01, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > > On 12/12/2018 1:10 PM, Jason Resch wrote: >> Right, which is what Bruno's result, Markus Muller's paper shows is the case >> with arithmetical truth in its relation to physical systems. Assuming >> arithemtical truth, one can explain how to derive physics from it. > > No. You can claim it's consistent with a little bit of physics. And you can > claim that you "must be able to derive physics”.
Physicalism imposes a non computationalist theory of mind. Or explain the role of physics in the mind. If you succeed without invoking magic, numbers will too. If you use magic also, actually, but the point is that we can test all this. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
