> On 20 Sep 2019, at 09:19, spudboy100 via Everything List 
> <everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> 
> At this point, I'd settle for mere intelligence that helps solve human 
> problems as opposed to the "hard" Chalmers Question. 

Chalmers “hard problem” is just a materialist reformulation of the well known, 
by philosopher of mind and theologian, mind-body problem.

For some humans, death or the idea of death is a problem, which plays a big 
role in our history, but of course, you might not be interested in that human 
problem or type of human problem. That’s OK, but I am not sure we ever discuss 
here of human problem, we just try to figure out what is happening here and 
now, and why …

Bruno 



> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be>
> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Thu, Sep 19, 2019 9:19 am
> Subject: Re: Why Consciousness Cannot Be Algorithmic
> 
> 
>> On 17 Sep 2019, at 22:23, spudboy100 via Everything List 
>> <everything-list@googlegroups.com <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Premise-wise, Consciousness could indeed be algorithmic, and thus emergent. 
>> In other words baked-in. 
>> View this video link and despair puny humans! 
>> https://openai.com/blog/emergent-tool-use/ 
>> <https://openai.com/blog/emergent-tool-use/>
> 
> 
> Consciousness cannot be algorithmic if Mechanism is true, because it relies 
> on the notion of truth, which is not just not algorithmic, but is not even 
> definable.
> 
> Consciousness is related to the semantic of some program observing itself, 
> and no program can defined its own semantic once he has enough arithmetical 
> belief.
> 
> Sometimes “mechanism” is described as a theory in which consciousness is 
> algorithmic, and that is OK for an oversimplified description of mechanism, 
> but at some point we have to be more precise to avoid contradictions and some 
> nonsense.
> 
> Most attribute of a program are not algorithmic.
> 
> A program can compute the factorial function. That is algorithmic. But the 
> attribute “being a program computing the factorial function” is not 
> algorithmic.
> 
> A total (everywhere defined) program is an algorithm, which stops on all 
> inputs. But being a program computing a total function, or emulating total 
> program is NOT algorithmic at all. It is Pi_2-complete, which is far beyond 
> what is emulable or definable by the partial computable function which does 
> not leave the sigma_1 reality.
> 
> In practice, that is not important, but it is crucial for handling the 
> mind-body problem when we assume mechanism.
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com <mailto:johnkcl...@gmail.com>>
>> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com 
>> <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>>
>> Sent: Tue, Sep 17, 2019 3:55 pm
>> Subject: Re: Why Consciousness Cannot Be Algorithmic
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:10 AM Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be 
>> <mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> wrote:
>> 
>> >>I think the guy is a bit of an idiot. He starts off badly by equating 
>> >>intelligence and consciousness and then it gets worse when he  defines the 
>> >>personal pronoun "I" by what will happen in the future rather than what 
>> >>actually happened in the past. And that was all in the first paragraph, I 
>> >>didn't read any further.  
>>  
>> > But “I” is used in statement concerning the future, or you could not say 
>> > “I didn’t read any further”.
>> 
>> "Did" is the PAST tense form of "do". However personal pronouns are 
>> perfectly fine and everybody uses them a thousand times a day, so it would 
>> be OK to say "I will not read him in the future" UNLESS:
>> 1) The statement was NOT made in our everyday world where personal pronoun 
>> duplicating machines don't exist yet, or...
>> 2) The personal pronoun was used in a thought experiment that was trying to 
>> illustrate a point about existentialism and the fundamental nature of 
>> personal identity.
>> 
>>  John K Clark
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1uoHkY%2BxUOh%3DkgMHgfw5GPoWQZwL67CDsTD1-WCZS1fg%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1uoHkY%2BxUOh%3DkgMHgfw5GPoWQZwL67CDsTD1-WCZS1fg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>> <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1251532279.8809560.1568751818806%40mail.yahoo.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1251532279.8809560.1568751818806%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/850A8278-AE8B-4615-A788-9EA1B5D5522B%40ulb.ac.be
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/850A8278-AE8B-4615-A788-9EA1B5D5522B%40ulb.ac.be?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1769560140.10128221.1568963999872%40mail.yahoo.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1769560140.10128221.1568963999872%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/36826607-A8F3-4D77-8E4D-F33AE28889DA%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to