On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:43 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 7:04:42 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stathis Papaioannou <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 22:02, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> No. I am just applying logic to a model and showing it makes no sense >>>> -- something those who disagree, strenuously avoid to maintain their >>>> illusions. AG >>>> >>> >>> There is nothing illogical about duplication of matter. You are applying >>> an intuition from everyday experience. >>> >>>> >> There is not necessarily anything illogical about any made-up set of >> laws. The trouble is that we want evidence, and contact with experience. >> Living in a dream is all very well, but it won't get you anywhere...... >> >> Bruce >> > > They think they have a form or indication of evidence; namely, that there > is NO evidence of the collapse of the Schrodinger equation when the > measurement occurs. AG > What evidence do people want? The only evidence that is relevant is that when we make a measurement, we see only one outcome. You can dream up other copies seeing all the other outcomes if you like, but there is absolutely no direct evidence for that. Stick with the evidence -- that is what I say. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLT9_YmLr1n-9DZ0bGD2ODfA-R1rdK1YC%3DoM1x%3De2XvNOw%40mail.gmail.com.
