On 10/20/2019 10:46 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, October 20, 2019 at 6:35:10 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:



    On 10/20/2019 4:58 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 20, 2019 at 11:35:13 AM UTC-6, Brent wrote:



        On 10/19/2019 6:56 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:

            Sean says the decoherence time is 10^(-20) sec. So when
            the box is closed, the cat is in a superposition of
            alive and dead during that time interval, assuming the
            decay hasn't happened. If that's the case, I don't see
            how decoherence solves the paradox, unless we can assume
            an initial condition where the probability of one
            component of the superposition, that the cat is dead, is
            zero. Maybe this is the solution. What do you think? AG


        Maybe this is an easier question; after decoherence,
        assuming the radioactive source hasn't decayed, what is the
        wf of the cat?  Is the cat in a mixed state, alive or dead
        with some probabIlity for each? AG

        You can't "assume the radioactive source hasn't decayed". 
        The point Schroedinger's thought experiment is that when the
        box is closed you don't know whether or not it has decayed
        and so it is in a superposition of decayed and not-decayed
        and the cat is correlated with these states, so it is also in
        a superposition of dead and alive.

        Brent


    I thought you might say this. OK, then what function does
    decoherence have in possibly solving the apparent paradox of a
    cat alive and dead simultaneously. TIA, AG

    It doesn't necessarily solve "that problem".  Rather it shows why
    you can never detect such a state, assuming you buy Zurek's idea
    of envariance.  One way to look at it is it's the answer to
    Heisenberg's question: Where is the cut between the quantum and
    the classical?  Once envriance has acted, then the result is
    classical, i.e. you can ignore the other possibilities and
    renormalize the wave function.

    Brent


Woudn't you agree that if the system, in the case a cat, goes classical after 10^(-20) sec, its state must be a mixture at that point in time even if the box hasn't been opened?  AG

In MWI it's only a mixture FAPP.  But if you haven't opened the box (and Schroedinger was assuming an ideal box) you don't know whether the cat has "gone classical" or not.  So your representation of its state is still a superposition.  That's the QBist interpretation. The wf is just what you know about the system.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/59649bbc-fbef-e309-2d9b-3400b03d3954%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to