On 11/7/2019 8:06 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 8:47:15 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



    On 11/7/2019 6:39 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 6:25:37 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



        On 11/7/2019 5:01 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:

            There is no paradox.  It's just some hang up you have
            that a cat can't be dead and alive at the same time. 
            It's as though your physics was stuck in the time of
            Aristotle and words were magic so that "Alive implies
            not-dead." was a law of physics instead of an axiom of
            logic.

            In fact a moments thought will tell you that quite aside
            from quantum mechanics there would be no way to identify
            the moment of death of the cat to less than a several
            seconds.  It would be simply meaningless to say the cat
            was alive at 0913:20 and dead at 0913:21.

            Brent


        You can imagine a different experiment, without cats, with
        the same paradoxical result. The point of Schroedinger's
        thought experiment was to demonstate tHE title of this
        thread; that there's something wrong with the prevailing
        interpretation of superposition. In your view I am hung up
        with Aristotle? In my view, you're seduced by some quantum
        nonsense. AG

        Prevailing when?  1927?  There is no problem in the
        prevailing 2019 interpretation, except in your mind because
        you assume that a cat cannot be in a superposition of
        alive/dead even for a fraction of a
        nano-second...because...WHY?   The radioactive atom can be in
        a superposition of decayed and not-decayed for a nanosecond. 
        Why doesn't that violate your Aristotelean logic?

        Brent


    What's wrong with the interpretation that the radioactive atom is
    either decayed OR undecayed with probabilities calculated by
    Born's Rule? AG

    Being in the quasi-classical state of either decayed or undecayed
    assumes the superposition of decayed and undecayed has decohered
    by interaction with the environment.  The interactions that
    produce decoherence all proceed at less than the speed of light,
    so it is not instantaneous.  So the atom and the cat are no
    different...except the time for which one can keep them isolated
    from the environment.

    Brent


Maybe isolation is an idealization which never exists in nature. That would put this issue to bed. AG

Except that isolation admits of degrees, and interactions, even at the speed of light, are not instantaneous.  The atomic nucleus is relatively isolated.  That's why the environment has no measurable effect on its half-life.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5e12425d-127e-5c60-852c-a9c6d24089a9%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to