I am not going to pass judgment on this. I can't really do that. I can only say that this is a minority report. The general consensus I am hearing is that a compound that changes the pH of blood in a way that slows the progress of a protistan responsible for malaria has no influence on a corona virus.
LC On Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 3:02:12 PM UTC-5 spudb...@aol.com wrote: > Refute this Telmo- > https://www.henryford.com/news/2020/07/hydro-treatment-study > > https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext > > One viewer here indicated this was not a study-but it is a study indeed > concluding the benefits of Hydro. > > Now what do I think? If it works it works, and if it doesn't it doesn't. > Do the opponents of the old drug in question care if it works? Seemingly > no, they are just foaming at the mouth because Orange Dude endorsed it. If > it doesn't work, screw it. If it can help some people, keep it at hand. > What does John Clark care about? Orange Man Bad! This has zero to do with > fighting the Wuhan flu. For the opponents of Orange Man nothing else > matters. Civil (US) Conflict? Next stop! Take care. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.net> > To: John Clark <johnk...@gmail.com>; 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everyth...@googlegroups.com> > Sent: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 2:28 pm > Subject: Re: Sharpiegate > > > > Am Do, 30. Jul 2020, um 17:16, schrieb John Clark: > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:27 AM Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.net> > wrote: > > > > *I disapprove of Trump and everything he stands for as much as you do. > I detest him. He is an incompetent narcissist, and his election as the > president of the USA was a nightmare come true.* > > > Truer words were never spoken! > > > *I think that the current extreme political polarization of all things > is doing damage to science. A symptom of this is that the epistemological > status of things such as the efficacy of hydroxychloriquine became > impossible to determine for those not deeply involved in the field, even if > scientifically literate and able to follow the papers.* > > > Crackpots, and in that I would include Trump supporters and the > hydroxychloroquine cure COVID-19 people, don't just dispute well > established theories, they dispute the raw data itself. I've had otherwise > intelligent people tell me that every epidemiologist in the world is wrong, > and the entire scientific community is wrong, and even insist every bit of > data we have about COVID-19 is wrong. Why would they do that? Because if > the data was right they would have to radically change their worldview and > face the fact that Donald Trump is not doing a good job. Changing one's > worldview is quite painful for some people. > > Nobody can be knowledgeable about everything, so if the vast majority of > expert > specialists in the world on a very complicated subject like epidemiology, > agrees on something, people who have spent their life studying the subject, > then I think they are much more likely to be correct then you or I are > after we've only been studying the matter for 20 minutes or so. That's why > people read scientific journals and believe that what they say is probably > true even if they haven't personally carried out the experiments described > in them. People that we trust, because they have proven to be right in the > past, judge new research and if they think it's not valid they don't > publish it in their journals, and if they think it is valid then they do. > It's a web of trust, it's what the cryptographic program PGP uses to > ensure that a public key really belongs to the person that it claims to. > And history has shown the system, although not perfect, works pretty well > most of the time, which is a hell of a lot better than most things work. > > And by the way, I don't think Trump has spent even 20 minutes studying > viral epidemiology or statistical theory in his entire life. > > > I more or less agree with everything you say. That is exactly why I worry > that incidents such as the Lancet retraction are damaging to the web of > trust. > > > Telmo > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/777296fb-a76b-4b8a-aef6-f8bb70c45aa4%40www.fastmail.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/777296fb-a76b-4b8a-aef6-f8bb70c45aa4%40www.fastmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4cbd46d5-96e5-49d8-b662-6e9b4c493e92n%40googlegroups.com.
