On 10-04-2022 02:43, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/9/2022 5:15 PM, smitra wrote:
On 09-04-2022 06:56, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 11:02 AM smitra <smi...@zonnet.nl> wrote:
This assumption is not valid in QM. In deterministic theories the
assumption is valid if the theory is local. But by conforming the QM
result one does not prove non-locality. One only proves that a
deterministic theory underlying QM must be nonlocal.
I understood that MWI was deterministic. Then, by your reasoning, it
must be non-local.
Determinism is invoked in the derivation of Bell inequalities in the
sense of de experimental outcomes being predetermined.
No, the outcomes are random sequences of 0s and 1s. How they
"predetermined" and predeterimined before what?
In local deterministic models, they are predetermined by the hidden
variables and the polarizer settings.
Saibal
Brent
That's not the case in the MWI because there is not a single outcome.
Saibal
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQEwoQC1AMu3hCST%3DKKKy06chRc_tX0F%2Bp%2BOp%3DUxJ0hqw%40mail.gmail.com
[1].
Links:
------
[1]
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQEwoQC1AMu3hCST%3DKKKy06chRc_tX0F%2Bp%2BOp%3DUxJ0hqw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/81d2dc7cab7baf8378104e59ce2a291b%40zonnet.nl.
