On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 10:32 AM Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com>
wrote:

*>> I love any idea that fits the observational facts, and I don't care if
> it's spooky or not.  *
>
>
> *> What observational facts are you referring to?*
>

*The observational fact that Bell's Inequality is violated. I find that
spooky, and as Niels Bohr said "anybody who is not shocked by quantum
mechanics does not understand it". *

*> I posit that instantaneous expansion to infinity is a type of
> singularity. *


*If the entire universe became infinite at the same instant the
transformation from nothingness to somethingness occurred then the universe
wouldn't need to expand at all to remain infinite.*

* > if the universe is infinite, it never started and the BB never
> happened. Another way of saying this is that an infinite universe is
> uncreated or eternal. It never began! *


*The universe could be temporally finite but spatially infinite, or
spatially finite but temporally infinite, or both could be infinite, or
neither could be infinite. Nobody knows, not even you.  *

*> This is where the learned physicist from Case Western got it wrong. *


*And where you, Professor Grayson, **got it right?  Alan, you need to have
a little humility and consider the grim possibility that maybe, just maybe,
some people know more about some things than you do.*

*>> Nobody will ever prove that the universe is absolutely flat because
> there is always some measurement error, but the Planck satellite discovered
> that the cosmological scale curvature of space is 0.0007 ± 0.0019, and that
> is consistent with zero, AKA perfect flatness. If the universe is curved
> but it's too small for the Planck satellite to observe then it would have
> to be at least 9.3 TRILLION light years in diameter. Please understand that
> is just the lower bound, the upper bound is an infinite number of light
> years. *
>
>
> *> It could be that large. Did you pull that number out of a hat?*
>

*No. For the deviation to be unobservable by the Planck satellite,
deviation from perfect flatness would have to be smaller than about 0.1%.
If R is the radius of the observable universe and Rc is the minimum radius
of the entire universe then (R/Rc)^2 < 0.001.   Solving this inequality
gives us Rc > 32R approximately. Since this is just a back of the envelope
estimate and there are many uncertainties I used a factor of 100 to be
conservative. Volume is proportional to the cube of that so there must be
AT LEAST one million times more stuff in the entire universe than what we
can see, or will ever be able to see. And there could be infinitely more
stuff. *


*>>  If both the transition between non-existence and existence AND the
> finite process called "inflation" started at T=0 and stopped at some
> unknown time later then: *
> *1) The entire universe is finite if and only if it was finite at T=0 *
> *2) The entire universe is infinite if and only if it was infinite at T=0 *
>
>
> * > I disagree that T=0 is a beginning time for an infinite universe,
> which IMO has no beginning.*
>

*I could be wrong but I tend to agree that the universe, the entire
universe, probably had no beginning. I say that because I think the Many
Worlds theory is probably true, and because I think not just inflation but
the particular type of inflation called Eternal Inflation
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_inflation> is probably true.
However it was you, not me who first introduced the term "T=0", and by
definition that means time started then. And if you just decree that there
couldn't be a T=0 if the universe is spatially infinite then, as I said
before, you're assuming what you're trying to prove.   *

   John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
atp



>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv05yp56DWLiBas1qywqCyJX38%2BSH8uqjuO_cwLEsjb%3Dcg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to