On Wednesday, September 25, 2024 at 6:10:52 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 2:52 PM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

*>> Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation couldn't explain exactly, or even 
approximately, what a "measurement" is, *


*> Seriously; this is nonsense. Hardly anything can be explained "exactly".*


*True but if you can't explain measurement even approximately, and 
Copenhagen can't, then for them the word is just a meaningless sequence of 
ASCII characters. By contrast Many Worlds gives an objective clearly 
defined meaning to the concept, X is measured (a.k.a. observed) by Y  if 
and only if X and Y have become quantum entangled.    *

> this critique is way overblown IMO. When we measure an observable, name 
any observable, don't we know what we're measuring?


*According to Copenhagen a measurement can collapse the wave function, 
that's a pretty impressive power but can a dog perform a measurement? Can a 
cockroach, can an amoeba, can a rock? When you observe an electron you 
collapse the wave function of the electron, but if I observe you do I 
collapse your wave function? Copenhagen has no answer to any of these 
questions.  *

*> Maybe the electrons, all of them, and possibly everything else, wase 
entangled long ago, in the early universe when everything was in close 
proximity? AG*

 

*All the electrons in the observable universe probably were entangled long 
ago, Many Worlds certainly thinks so, that's why it claims that the entire 
universe could be described by one gigantic universal wave function that, 
depending on  circumstances, can often be simplified to such an enormous 
degree you can actually use it to make calculations. Billions of years ago 
all the electrons in the observable universe became entangled because they 
were jammed up close together and because Quantum Entanglement is a thing, 
but Quantum Disentanglement is also a thing. Today it's possible to isolate 
a small group of electrons (or atoms or even large molecules) for a very 
short time from you and from your experimental equipment and the rest of 
the universe; that's what happens when you perform the two slit experiment 
and see an interference pattern. But that can only happen if you are NOT 
entangled with the electrons, and that can only happen if you do NOT have 
which-way information. *


*>> Everybody believes the observable universe is finite.  *


*> Now suddenly you appeal to "belief".*


*Don't be silly. I can observe the observable universe by definition, and 
if I can observe something then it must be finite. I challenge you to find 
somebody who claims the observable universe is not observable, or claims 
that they can observe infinity.  *
 

 > *I appeal to the fact that the visible universe is expanding and I can 
turn the clock back, to ANY time in the past, and put a finite sphere 
around it!*


*Do you believe  the observable universe is the only part of the universe 
that exists? If you do then you must also believe that Earth is the center 
of the universe, or at least very very close to it, because space is flat 
at the largest scale, or at least very very close to flat.  *

*> You seem to have an inclination to put me down.*


*If you treat me politely then I will treat you the same way.  *

*> I think*


*Think or believe?  *

*> the unobservable part came into existence during Inflation, a finite 
process, so it is also finite and the whole bubble is finite. I don't claim 
I can prove it. AG*


*As I said before, even if inflation never happened there would still be 
galaxies expanding away from us faster than the speed of light, and it's an 
observational fact that galaxies are not just moving at high speed away 
from us, they are ACCELERATING away. *


*I am still waiting for an explanation of this claim. Also, if galaxies 
within our view are receding slower than c, and that was occurring for 13.8 
BY, why does the observable universe have a radius in excess of 2*13.8 BY? 
AG*
 


*And with or without inflation it would still be true that light travels at 
a finite speed, and the Big Bang happened a finite number of years ago, so 
that alone severely limits what we are able to see, or will ever be able to 
see.  *

  John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
ymp


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/49f22364-5b71-4490-9d16-6e65ddf99e55n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to