On Thursday, October 17, 2024 at 8:05:10 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:



Le jeu. 17 oct. 2024, 15:56, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :



On Thursday, October 17, 2024 at 7:31:32 AM UTC-6 Quentin Anciaux wrote:



Le jeu. 17 oct. 2024, 14:14, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> a écrit :



On Thursday, October 17, 2024 at 5:20:26 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:14 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

*> Ostensibly, applying SR, Bob concludes Alice's clock is running slower 
than his, and vice-versa for Alice*


*Yes.*

*> so you conclude Alice get Bob's response to her question before she 
sends it.*


*No. Watching somebody's Clock that is running slower than your clock does 
NOT mean you are observing their time running backwards.  *


*I know that! You claimed from Bob's pov, Alice's clock is running slower 
(not running backwards), and when he sends his reply his clock reads 2, 
whereas Alice's clock reads 1, before she sent the question. I remember 
that clearly. No one claimed her clock was running backwards. So, without 
instantaneous anything how is the paradox resolved, and how is this related 
to MW? TY, AG*


The paradox is resoved if there is mo ftl... please do a work on yourself 
and try to understand what others are saying... 


*Anyone can say anything, including yourself, but that's not a proof of 
anything. At best it's a claim. AG *


? If there is no ftl, there is no paradox, ftl brings a paradox because the 
simultaneity plan is different for alice and bob. That's just SR, that's 
just what JC said and he's not claiming anything afaics.


*Another claim. The only thing lacking is a proof. Moreover, you're 
factually mistaken. There IS an apparent paradox without FTL. The paradox 
is how can Bob and Alice see the other's clock running slower. AG* 


*> Obviously, there's a major problem here and I suspect it's related to 
your interpretation of relative clock rates in SR.*


*It's odd, no doubt about it, but it causes no physical paradoxes IF 
nothing can travel through space faster than the speed of light. *


*Ostensibly, there is a paradox and you seem unable to resolve it. Claiming 
it is "odd" fails to resolve the matter. I think Brent knows the solution. 
AG*
 

*Space itself can move at any speed without producing paradoxes. If there 
existed particles that moved through space faster than the speed of light** 
(called Tachyons 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon> ) and it was possible for us to 
interact with them, then causality would be violated. And if Bob and Alice 
used tachyons instead of light photons to observe then they would see the 
others clock moving backwards, not just slowing down.  And you'd be able to 
observe and even kill your grandfather 10 years before he met your 
grandmother, and you'd have to deal with all the paradoxes that would 
produce. But as far as we can tell Tachyons do not exist. *
 

*> I can't say exactly what's the problem with your interpretation of 
relative clock rates. Nor do I understand what this has to do with the 
viability of MW.*


*I was just making the point that if Tachyons existed (and I do NOT think 
they do) then the only way I can think of to resolve the grandfather 
paradox is through Many Worlds. If you or anybody else can think of another 
way to resolve it I'm all ears.  *

*John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
deq

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].

To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3cf9704c-f6b7-4b5a-995c-bf4f506f9488n%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3cf9704c-f6b7-4b5a-995c-bf4f506f9488n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].

To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/46236c0d-718a-41c9-a050-b180fdb574f9n%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/46236c0d-718a-41c9-a050-b180fdb574f9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4d48c6c8-524e-4667-b1d1-0629259c15b8n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to