Bret Mogilefsky wrote: >On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:09:24PM -0400, Mike Sangrey wrote: > >>Also, if you stick `Trash' down in `vFolders' I would have assumed THAT >>`Trash' folder had something to do with stuff deleted out of `vFolders' >>and that REALLY gets confusing. >> > >I think this is the problem: The term "Trash" has a meaning assigned to it >that people are accustomed to from using other mail clients... Deleted >things get *moved* into it, and you go in there to pull them out. >Furthermore, you're used to seeing one for each account you pull mail from. >We're running into problems because we're using the same term but it means >something completely different. > >My suggestion? Rename "Trash" to "Deleted Items" and put it down among the >vFolders. (You can pick something shorter/more specific than "Deleted >Items", as long as it doesn't confuse with "Trash".) If, as some have >suggested, traditional Trash functionality is available in a later release, >call THAT "Trash", but retain "Deleted Items" for the name of this vFolder. > > >Bret >
I with Bret on this. Especially since, using the Trash name means that I can't get to the real IMAP folder called Trash that all my other mail readers use. Having the vFolder would be fine if Evo was all I use. Many of us use more than just evo to access mail. I use Evo on Linux, Mozilla on windows, mutt when remote and so on. Scott _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
