1.2.1, also, and this is a "Reply to list", too. I think I have it
narrowed down. If the original message was addressed to the list only,
then "Reply to List" works. But if the 'original' message was a "Reply
to All" with the sender in the "To" field, and the list in the "cc"
field, then, even a "Reply to list" results in both the sender and the
list as addressees.
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:17, Brett Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:23, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
>
> > Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default
> > replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject
> > treats its "Reply to List" feature as "Reply to All". There should be a
> > difference.
>
> Eh? This message is a result of "Reply to List", and it contains only a
> single "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" header. "Reply to All" results in two
> headers ("To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"). Looks
> like a significant difference to me. FWIW, I'm running evo 1.2.1 on a
> debain testing-ish system. Are you running an older version?
>
> Cheers!
--
Arthur S. Alexion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Arthur S. Alexion LLC
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
