No, the problem is that you are using Reply-to-List on the message that
was Cc'd to you and didn't pass through the mailing-list software and
thus does NOT have the mailing-list headers that Evolution checks for.
If you Reply-to-List on a message and Evolution can't figure out what
list it was to, it reverts to Reply-to-All instead.
Jeff
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 18:12, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> 1.2.1, also, and this is a "Reply to list", too. I think I have it
> narrowed down. If the original message was addressed to the list only,
> then "Reply to List" works. But if the 'original' message was a "Reply
> to All" with the sender in the "To" field, and the list in the "cc"
> field, then, even a "Reply to list" results in both the sender and the
> list as addressees.
>
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:17, Brett Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:23, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> >
> > > Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default
> > > replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject
> > > treats its "Reply to List" feature as "Reply to All". There should be a
> > > difference.
> >
> > Eh? This message is a result of "Reply to List", and it contains only a
> > single "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" header. "Reply to All" results in two
> > headers ("To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"). Looks
> > like a significant difference to me. FWIW, I'm running evo 1.2.1 on a
> > debain testing-ish system. Are you running an older version?
> >
> > Cheers!
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
