OK, so you and Tim are better shoppers than I and were
better prepared for this one.  Now, can we have a show
of hands: how many admins out there who are studying
for or doing a migration to 07 had any idea that a SAN
cert will very likely be required?

--- "Wells, James Arthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> BEFORE Exchange 2007 RTM, they were expensive.
> If you insisted on Verisign certs, they were VERY
> expensive.
> 
> Even Verisign bought a smaller company to sell SAN
> certs in the last year, though.
> 
> 
> --James
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Tim Vander Kooi
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 2:42 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Is Exchange 2007 worth it over 2003?
> 
> I have SAN certs and they are not very expensive. If
> you paid a lot for yours then you paid too much. I
> have the exact situation you describe and paid less
> than $200 to cover all of my various names. Much
> cheaper than the old way in my opinion.
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Albert Duro
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 2:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Is Exchange 2007 worth it over 2003?
> 
> we're going off on a tangent here, but say your
> Exchange 2007 Server has a public Cname and a
> different internal hostname (not an uncommon
> situation), then your "very cheap" certificate will
> not work, even though it worked before on Server
> 2003
> with the same name split.  You'll need a 'Subject
> Alternative Name' certificate, and they ain't cheap.
> 
> --- Tim Vander Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I'm sorry, but as was discussed on one of the
> lists
> > a week or so ago... Exchange certs are NOT
> > expensive. They are really very cheap.
> > TVK
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Albert Duro
> > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 12:11 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Is Exchange 2007 worth it over 2003?
> >
> > yes you can.  BUT that doesn't really give you a
> > feel
> > for 07 so long as it's an inert sidekick.  It's
> when
> > it takes over that all heck breaks loose.  That's
> > why
> > I recommended it for a separate network.
> > Just one of many, many examples of what can go
> > radically different is that your certificate(s)
> may
> > no
> > longer work with 07, and you may have to acquire
> > new,
> > expensive ones.
> >
> > --- "Wohlgemuth, Mike"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Can't you install 07 alongside 03 and keep
> user's
> > > mailboxes on 03 until
> > > you get comfortable with 07 and then just move
> the
> > > mailboxes over?
> > >
> > > Just wondering as that is what I was lead to
> > believe
> > > ...
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Behalf Of
> > > Albert Duro
> > > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 11:06 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Re: Is Exchange 2007 worth it over
> 2003?
> > >
> > > I have found the change from Exch 03 to 07 far
> > more
> > > demanding and
> > > stressful
> > > that the change from NT/5.5 to AD/Exch 2K.  And
> > I've
> > > often complained of
> > > how
> > > unnecessarily difficult Exch 07 is, and how it
> > seems
> > > to me like an
> > > incomplete product, with too many rough and
> > > crumbling edges.
> > > I can see that it offers advantages to a large
> > shop
> > > with a complex
> > > topology
> > > and teams of admins who can delve into its
> > > complexities.  But for a
> > > small
> > > shop with a tiny team or a team of one, 07 is,
> > > frankly, a Katrina.
> > > But you can't afford to ignore it, either.  My
> > > hesitant advice is to
> > > stay
> > > with 03 for production and get acquainted with
> 07
> > in
> > > a lab or separate
> > > network.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Paul Hutchings"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions"
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:36 AM
> > > Subject: Is Exchange 2007 worth it over 2003?
> > >
> > >
> > > We currently have a single Exchange 2003 SP2
> > server
> > > servicing all our
> > > mailboxes and public folders.
> > >
> > > In six months or so I need to look at replacing
> > the
> > > hardware, which
> > > means I need to be thinking now what I want to
> do
> > on
> > > the software side
> > > for testing/budgeting purposes etc.
> > >
> > > I'm looking at the feature list of Exchange 2007
> > vs.
> > > 2003 and I'm kind
> > > of scratching my head and thinking "What's the
> big
> > > deal"?
> > >
> > > We've just gone down the route of a SAN and a
> > small
> > > ESX cluster, and
> > > what I'm currently thinking is skip the software
> > > upgrade next year and
> > > stick with 2003, and get it virtualized properly
> > to
> > > add some resiliency,
> > > then review it the following year.
> > >
> > > I'd welcome all feedback but I'm looking at all
> > the
> > > E27K comparison
> > > matrices and tbh there's not much that's
> > convincing
> > > me that the $70k or
> > > so just in CAL costs is going to benefit us
> > > sufficiently to justify it.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > --
> > > MIRA Ltd
> > >
> > > Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10
> 0TU,
> > > England.
> > >
> > > Registered in England and Wales No. 402570
> > > VAT Registration  GB 114 5409 96
> > >
> > > The contents of this e-mail are confidential and
> > are
> > > solely for the use
> > > of
> > > the intended recipient.
> > > If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> delete
> 
=== message truncated ===


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Reply via email to