Assuming a lot of facts not in evidence.. Option 2.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) ** CTR ** [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Mail Flow Configuration Question
>
>
> We have an Exchange enterprise of about 10 000 mailboxes. We
> have a mixture
> of clients ranging from Exchange clients to Outlook 2000 to
> Netscape IMAP
> clients using SMTP to relay outbound email. Currently, in
> some of our more
> remote sites we have some of the IMAP users who need a local
> relay host, to
> prevent slowing of the client while sending mail. We have
> narrowed it down
> to 2 solutions. I would like some external opinions as to
> which is the
> better solution. (more reliable, more secure, more efficient)
> Our enterprise
> is Exchange 5.5 SP 4 running on Windows 2000 Advanced server.
>
>
>
>
>
> Option 1. Install a local IMS and allow relaying of mail traffic.
>
> Option 2. Use the IIS SMTP service installed on the box to
> relay all SMTP
> traffic to the backbone relay hosts.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
