Said prankster should have in addition to sending the message [1] changed
his password to "Don'tLeaveYourWorkstationUnlockedFool" and then locked the
workstation.  

Matthew
[1] I don't advocate what said prankster did [2]
[2] although I did get a good chuckle out of it [3]
[3] considering I had a rotten day because of a clueless VP.[4]
[4] I don't know Sherry [5] but I think your supposed to say Hi, so Hi
Sherry 
[5] Not that I've had the opportunity or wouldn't welcome the opportunity. 


>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>>>Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:57 PM
>>>To: Exchange Discussions
>>>Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
>>>
>>>
>>>So, the only head which really needs to on a pike is that of 
>>>one Mr. McDonald?
>>>
>>>Chris
>>>-- 
>>>Chris Scharff
>>>Senior Sales Engineer
>>>MessageOne
>>>If you can't measure, you can't manage! 
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:58 PM
>>>> To: Exchange Discussions
>>>> Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ha.. actually I just learned  he 'was' asked that question..
>>>> 
>>>> Turns out, ol' McDonald was away from his desk from 9 till
>>>> 10am and left his box accessible. All indications are that 
>>>> the message was sent from the client on his desk. The message 
>>>> was found in the Sent Items of his mailbox. There appears to 
>>>> have been no logon recorded in Admin during that hour 
>>>> (implying his mailbox was not opened from another PC), and 
>>>> there were no suspicious 1016's (implying the Admin was not 
>>>> in on it). The message was of blue Arial font (implying OWA 
>>>> was not used to send it, and his password is secure), and 
>>>> there was no access recorded by the box acting as the SMTP 
>>>> server (implying O.E. was not used to send it, and his creds 
>>>> are secure). Oh.. and someone saw somebody at his desk around 
>>>> the time (implying.. oh
>>>> hell..)
>>>> 
>>>> so they figured it out.
>>>> this was not quite the challenge I thought it'd be.
>>>> 
>>>> Tim.
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:38 PM
>>>> To: Exchange Discussions
>>>> Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Ask McDonald, "Where exactly were you at 9:19AM this morning,
>>>> and for how long before that, and who knew?"
>>>> 
>>>> i.e. was he in the washroom with his $250 Italian leathers
>>>> poking out underneath the stall, making noises that indicated 
>>>> extreme abdominal discomfort...  :)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>> > Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:13 AM
>>>> > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
>>>> > Conversation: Investigating a Forged Message
>>>> > Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Thanks.
>>>> > 
>>>> > I believe item #1 (of my post) is most probable.. hell, 
>>>I must leave 
>>>> > OL2k open and unattended on my PC a dozen times every day for
>>>> minutes at a
>>>> > stretch.
>>>> > 
>>>> > However, this takes balls. Considering the length and articulate 
>>>> > phrasing of the message, it seems the person would have spent an
>>>> > inordinate amount of
>>>> > time at McDonald's desk. Certainly someone should have seen 
>>>> > somebody there.
>>>> > 
>>>> > I have recommended they check the EV on the server which 
>>>McDonald's 
>>>> > mailbox resides for EV 1016's.. just incase the Admin 
>>>was in on it.
>>>> > 
>>>> > Tim.
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: Wright, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:47 AM
>>>> > To: Exchange Discussions
>>>> > Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > It appears that it was send via Exchange since there are no
>>>> internet
>>>> > addresses in the TO: FROM: fields.  Also, if you check the
>>>> headers and
>>>> > there is nothing there, then you have the culprit in-house
>>>> and logging
>>>> > on legitimately via the user's account.  The original 
>>>suggestions 
>>>> > below are probably what occurred.
>>>> > 
>>>> > How accessible is the VP's computer?  May be someone took a quick
>>>> > opportunity at an unattended computer.  If they were very 
>>>> clever, they
>>>> > might have set the message to delay a day or so before delivery.
>>>> > 
>>>> > Hope everyone at the company took it seriously and went home ;-)
>>>> > 
>>>> > Steve
>>>> > 
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:39 AM
>>>> > To: Exchange Discussions
>>>> > Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Headers, Let us see the headers.
>>>> > 
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
>>>> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM
>>>> > To: Exchange Discussions
>>>> > Subject: Investigating a Forged Message
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine
>>>> Friday.. put
>>>> > on your investigator hats..
>>>> > 
>>>> > My wife forwarded this message to me:
>>>> > 
>>>> > > From:  McDonald, Arthur K.  
>>>> > > Sent:  Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM
>>>> > > To:    EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems
>>>> > > Subject:       Much to be grateful for...
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and
>>>> > for that
>>>> > > reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go 
>>>home at noon 
>>>> > > today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more
>>>> > than I will
>>>> > > ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your
>>>> neighbors,
>>>> > > love life and be grateful for all we have in this 
>>>great nation of
>>>> > > ours.  Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to 
>>>> take on the
>>>> > > world!
>>>> > 
>>>> > ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, "Arthur", VP 
>>>(Very Pissed), 
>>>> > wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the 
>>>> > following likely prospects:
>>>> > 
>>>> > 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop;
>>>> > 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username & password;
>>>> > 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted "User" or "Send as"
>>>> permission
>>>> > to culprit
>>>> > 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or 
>>>used a similar
>>>> > serve from the web.
>>>> > 
>>>> > Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a
>>>> few details
>>>> > that have be provide me. Care to contribute?
>>>> > 
>>>> > Tim.
>>>> > 
>>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>>> > List posting FAQ:       
>>>http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>> > Archives:               
>>>http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>>> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>>> > List posting FAQ:       
>>>http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>> > Archives:               
>>>http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>>> > To 
>>>unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > 
>>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>>> > List posting FAQ:       
>>>http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>> > Archives:     
>>>          http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>>> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > 
>>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>>> > List posting FAQ:       
>>>http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>> > Archives:     
>>>          http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>>> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > 
>>>> 
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>>> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> 
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>>> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> 
>>>
>>>_________________________________________________________________
>>>List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>>>To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to