Well - now you have something to fantasize about the next time he tries to call you on 
the carpet.

Darcy

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Investigating a Forged Message


Oooh... how I would LOVE to catch my manager's workstation unlocked!!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Darcy Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:18 PM
Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message


> In our office, if your workstation is found unlocked the most likely
penalty is the note sent from your mailbox inviting everyone to a mocha (if
in the morning) or a beer (if in the evening) at your expense.
>
> Ah, yeah - along with your screensaver being changed to display something
like "Luser left his workstation unlocked, again". . . even our VP isn't
immune to that one.
>
> Darcy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
>
>
> Said prankster should have in addition to sending the message [1] changed
> his password to "Don'tLeaveYourWorkstationUnlockedFool" and then locked
the
> workstation.
>
> Matthew
> [1] I don't advocate what said prankster did [2]
> [2] although I did get a good chuckle out of it [3]
> [3] considering I had a rotten day because of a clueless VP.[4]
> [4] I don't know Sherry [5] but I think your supposed to say Hi, so Hi
> Sherry
> [5] Not that I've had the opportunity or wouldn't welcome the opportunity.
>
>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:57 PM
> >>>To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>So, the only head which really needs to on a pike is that of
> >>>one Mr. McDonald?
> >>>
> >>>Chris
> >>>--
> >>>Chris Scharff
> >>>Senior Sales Engineer
> >>>MessageOne
> >>>If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:58 PM
> >>>> To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>> Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ha.. actually I just learned  he 'was' asked that question..
> >>>>
> >>>> Turns out, ol' McDonald was away from his desk from 9 till
> >>>> 10am and left his box accessible. All indications are that
> >>>> the message was sent from the client on his desk. The message
> >>>> was found in the Sent Items of his mailbox. There appears to
> >>>> have been no logon recorded in Admin during that hour
> >>>> (implying his mailbox was not opened from another PC), and
> >>>> there were no suspicious 1016's (implying the Admin was not
> >>>> in on it). The message was of blue Arial font (implying OWA
> >>>> was not used to send it, and his password is secure), and
> >>>> there was no access recorded by the box acting as the SMTP
> >>>> server (implying O.E. was not used to send it, and his creds
> >>>> are secure). Oh.. and someone saw somebody at his desk around
> >>>> the time (implying.. oh
> >>>> hell..)
> >>>>
> >>>> so they figured it out.
> >>>> this was not quite the challenge I thought it'd be.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tim.
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:38 PM
> >>>> To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>> Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ask McDonald, "Where exactly were you at 9:19AM this morning,
> >>>> and for how long before that, and who knew?"
> >>>>
> >>>> i.e. was he in the washroom with his $250 Italian leathers
> >>>> poking out underneath the stall, making noises that indicated
> >>>> extreme abdominal discomfort...  :)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>>> > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>> > Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:13 AM
> >>>> > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> >>>> > Conversation: Investigating a Forged Message
> >>>> > Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I believe item #1 (of my post) is most probable.. hell,
> >>>I must leave
> >>>> > OL2k open and unattended on my PC a dozen times every day for
> >>>> minutes at a
> >>>> > stretch.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > However, this takes balls. Considering the length and articulate
> >>>> > phrasing of the message, it seems the person would have spent an
> >>>> > inordinate amount of
> >>>> > time at McDonald's desk. Certainly someone should have seen
> >>>> > somebody there.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I have recommended they check the EV on the server which
> >>>McDonald's
> >>>> > mailbox resides for EV 1016's.. just incase the Admin
> >>>was in on it.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Tim.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>>> > From: Wright, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:47 AM
> >>>> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>> > Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > It appears that it was send via Exchange since there are no
> >>>> internet
> >>>> > addresses in the TO: FROM: fields.  Also, if you check the
> >>>> headers and
> >>>> > there is nothing there, then you have the culprit in-house
> >>>> and logging
> >>>> > on legitimately via the user's account.  The original
> >>>suggestions
> >>>> > below are probably what occurred.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > How accessible is the VP's computer?  May be someone took a quick
> >>>> > opportunity at an unattended computer.  If they were very
> >>>> clever, they
> >>>> > might have set the message to delay a day or so before delivery.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Hope everyone at the company took it seriously and went home ;-)
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Steve
> >>>> >
> >>>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>>> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:39 AM
> >>>> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>> > Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Headers, Let us see the headers.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
> >>>> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:33 AM
> >>>> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >>>> > Subject: Investigating a Forged Message
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Here's a little something some of you may enjoy this fine
> >>>> Friday.. put
> >>>> > on your investigator hats..
> >>>> >
> >>>> > My wife forwarded this message to me:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > From: McDonald, Arthur K.
> >>>> > > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:19 AM
> >>>> > > To: EPDS Contractors; EPDS - EPI Data Systems
> >>>> > > Subject: Much to be grateful for...
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > All of us in this division have much to be grateful for and
> >>>> > for that
> >>>> > > reason, I would like to encourage each of you to go
> >>>home at noon
> >>>> > > today. You may use my annual leave since I have far more
> >>>> > than I will
> >>>> > > ever use. Go home, be with your families, talk with your
> >>>> neighbors,
> >>>> > > love life and be grateful for all we have in this
> >>>great nation of
> >>>> > > ours.  Then come back on Monday refreshed and ready to
> >>>> take on the
> >>>> > > world!
> >>>> >
> >>>> > ahem.. *chortle* ..well, in any event, "Arthur", VP
> >>>(Very Pissed),
> >>>> > wants a head on a pike. I will offer to him (via my woman) the
> >>>> > following likely prospects:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 1) The culprit got direct access to OL2k on the desktop;
> >>>> > 2) The culprit knew Arthur's username & password;
> >>>> > 3) A confederate Exchange Admin granted "User" or "Send as"
> >>>> permission
> >>>> > to culprit
> >>>> > 4) Culprit spoofed the message from an SMTP srvr, or
> >>>used a similar
> >>>> > serve from the web.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Feel free to presume the obvious; and I can pass along a
> >>>> few details
> >>>> > that have be provide me. Care to contribute?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Tim.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> > List posting FAQ:
> >>>http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>> > Archives:
> >>>http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> > List posting FAQ:
> >>>http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>> > Archives:
> >>>http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>> > To
> >>>unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> > List posting FAQ:
> >>>http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>> > Archives:
> >>>          http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> > List posting FAQ:
> >>>http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>> > Archives:
> >>>          http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>_________________________________________________________________
> >>>List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >>>Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> >>>To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to