Paul,
Thanks for this; I avoided O2K as it needs the admin kit (is that
the name) to install on TS but Outlook98 installs apparently OK. The
symptoms you describe are very similar. When you say 'transformed', what are
you referring to?
Cheers, Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 12:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Was Outlook Transformed to work with TS?
We use W2K AS with TS to provide our Accounts with the means to run a legacy
Access database that has grown so fat it needs a dual 1Gig + 512Mb RAM to
process the queries (yes, I know - what a waste but the migration to SQL is
happening slowly).
Anyway back to the point. Fire up Access in a TS session and all is well
and good. Fire up Access as an App on the server and it runs like a
two-legged hamster. O2K had to be transformed to work with TS - I not know
if other office versions need this but does any of it fit with your
predicament Roger?
PBB
~ndi
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 12:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
just did, less than 10 ms.
-----Original Message-----
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2002 10:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Dumb question, but have you tried pinging your server and checking the
response time?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 January 2002 10:32
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
>
>
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone recognise this bizarre situation.
>
> Outlook 98 on a NT4 Terminal Server (hosting a witches
> brew of other
> applications to do with telephone logging). MAPI profile connecting an
> Exchange 5.5 SP3 + store fix. Console auto logs in to run telephone
> statistics collection and uses Outlook 98 for the purposes of
> e-mailing
> reports. If you manually send mail to GAL entries, no problem. If you
> manually send mail to an SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the Outlook process
> freezes as you type the '@' (this is not displayed) and task
> manager shows
> it burning lots of cpu. It eventually returns control. The
> automated report
> mailing process by necessity uses SMTP addresses and times out the
> application. Bizarrely if you check the properties of any of
> the standard
> folders they do not display permissions tabs, synchronisation
> tab etc as if
> the folders were based on a PST.
>
> BUT if you login to the same user via the TS client
> service, Outlook
> 98, using the same mail profile behaves completely normally!
>
> As this is a live logging service with bundles of bespoke
> applications I'm completely stuffed when it comes to experimenting
> with the service.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
>
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
