One article I read said that in an A/A situation such that you plan as if
you will be running A/P and then split them up between the two nodes
assigned to the A/A cluster.

Makes sense to me.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
> ----------
> From:         Roger Seielstad
> Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:         Monday, October 14, 2002 09:36
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> 
> You'd be wrong there.
> 
> You can get the same amount of users on active/active or active/passive,
> although realistically, active/passive allows for more users.
> 
> In either case, if you're clustering identical hardware, you can either
> put
> all your users on one box (a/p) or half on each (a/a). In either case,
> both
> servers need to be able to handle the same number of users.
> 
> The memory fragmentation issues would lead me to believe that A/P would be
> more likely to support a higher number of users than A/A, on identical
> hardware.
> 
> Roger
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:32 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > 
> > 
> > No, according to the theory you can get more users on 
> > Active/Active because both cluster nodes are being used to do 
> > something useful. But if one fails, the other node better be 
> > able to take on the load.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:50 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > 
> > 
> > Stay away from active/active.  Go Active/passive instead.  You can get
> > more users on Active/Passive.
> > 
> > Denny
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Imran Iqbal
> > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:36 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > 
> > 
> > We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part of our move to Exchange
> > 2000 I am considering setting up Exchange on a 2 node Active Active
> > cluster and would be interested in hearing anyone views or real world
> > experiences with similar setups.  Each server would have about 800
> > active users and would probably be connected to a SAN for the shared
> > storage.
> > 
> > I have heard that there were memory issues with this setup pre SP3.  I
> > would like to know if there are any other problems and if it is worth
> > doing
> > 
> > Thanks in advance
> > 
> > 
> > Imran
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to