A tootsie roll.

> ----------
> From:         Morrison, Mike L.
> Reply To:     Exchange Discussions
> Sent:         Monday, October 14, 2002 10:07
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:      RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> 
> A stick.
> 
> Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:59 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> 
> 
> Whats brown and sticky?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:54 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> 
> 
> I love theories. 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:32 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > 
> > 
> > No, according to the theory you can get more users on
> > Active/Active because both cluster nodes are being used to do 
> > something useful. But if one fails, the other node better be 
> > able to take on the load.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:50 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > 
> > 
> > Stay away from active/active.  Go Active/passive instead.
> > You can get more users on Active/Passive.
> > 
> > Denny
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Imran Iqbal
> > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:36 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
> > 
> > 
> > We are currently an Exchange 5.5 site, as part of our move to
> > Exchange 2000 I am considering setting up Exchange on a 2 
> > node Active Active cluster and would be interested in hearing 
> > anyone views or real world experiences with similar setups.  
> > Each server would have about 800 active users and would 
> > probably be connected to a SAN for the shared storage.
> > 
> > I have heard that there were memory issues with this setup
> > pre SP3.  I would like to know if there are any other 
> > problems and if it is worth doing
> > 
> > Thanks in advance
> > 
> > 
> > Imran
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> --
> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
> entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
> received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
> Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
> 
> ==========================================================================
> ==
> ==
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to