If you've taken the steps described in Q243632, then the next most likely
issue is available bandwidth as mentioned in Q194589.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett@;cotelligent.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> Event ID 57:  Source: MSExchangeMTA  Type: Warning  Category: X.400
> Service
>       The limit on the number of associations allowed to and from entity
> (X.400 address) has been reached.     The limit is 9. [MTA XFER-IN 19
> 34](12)
> 
> Event ID 289:  Source: MSExchangeMTA  Type: Warning  Category: X.400
> Service
>       A connection to (X.400 address) could not be opened [MTA XFER-IN 19
> 26](12)
> 
> Event ID 1290:  Source: MSExchagneMTA  Type: Warning  Category: X.400
> Service
>       A locally initiated association to (X.400 address) was refused. The
> failure reason provider was 0
>       and the reason was 0. Control block index 6. Type 1. [PLATFORM
> KERNEL 25 130](12)
> 
> Event ID 9202: Source: MSExchangeMTA  Type: Warning  Category: Operating
> System
>       A sockets error 10061 on an accept[] call was detected. The MTA will
> attempt to recover the sockets        connection.     Control block index:
> /.
> [BASE IL TCP/IP DRVR 8 256](12)
> 
> 
> These are the Event ID's that continually pop up on the one remote server
> with the same symptoms, the other server just produces the 289 event id
> only.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Josh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:53 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: X.400 issues
> 
> 
> Admission: I'm entirely too lazy to go look up the random odd event ID or
> guestimate what "too long"[1] means. It there any chance you (the
> collective
> you) could include the Event ID source and description in addition to the
> number? And that you could provide an example of sent/ received times
> which
> constitute a "too long" delivery time.
> 
> [1] When I worked at $vbc we initially had an MS Mail PO config which
> routinely resulted in >8 hour delivery times of mail from the US to
> Indonesia. If a user called and said it'd been six hours and the mail
> wasn't
> delivered, we didn't troubleshoot it.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:jbennett@;cotelligent.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:55 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have an incredibly annoying situation going on that I can't seem to
> > get a grip on. I am not sure of the magnitude of the errors I am
> > seeing due to the
> > fact that mail is still flowing.
> >
> > Here is my setup:
> >
> >         I am running WNT4.0 SP6 / EX 5.5 EE SP4 all hotfixes on all
> > these servers. I have a hub and spoke configuration within my EX org.
> > All my remote servers connect (through X.400 connectors) to a central
> > EX server that serves as my IMS to the internet. All the spoke servers
> > are BDC's in NT domains. The hub server is a member server in a
> > central domain that all other domains have 2-way trusts to. All the
> > remote servers (scattered across
> > the US) are connected to the hub server by full T1 lines.
> >
> > My issue is this:
> >
> >         The MTA on the hub server backs up and an Event ID: 289 is
> > written to the App log then the queue flushes clear and all mail is
> > delivered without incident. This seems to occur about every 10 minutes
> > or so during the day. There does not appear to be, at least on the
> > surface, any connectivity issues. Should I just ignore these errors,
> > as the mail is being delivered? Or is this just the beginning of a
> > major issue about to explode in my lap?
> >
> > Please help, I have dug around MS site and Google and come up with
> > little to no help.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Josh Bennett
> > Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer
> > Cotelligent, Inc.
> > 401 Parkway Drive
> > Broomall, PA. 19008
> > 610-359-5929
> > www.cotelligent.com
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to