And with outlook 2003, RPC over HTTP isn't nearly as remote user useful as cached mode is.
> From: "Ben Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:41:32 -0500 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues > > You still have to connect to the VPN to synchronize. So yes, it is > still as secure :-) > > The big gain is that users do not notice the performance hit from the > VPN because they are running everything in offline mode and just > requesting updated information every 10 minutes or whatever. The only > info that gets sent across the VPN is new messages, and anything they > send. > > > Ben Winzenz > Network Engineer > Gardner & White > (317) 581-1580 ext 418 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:59 AM > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > Conversation: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues > Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues > > > I was gonna ask the same thing. My other question is: is it as secure as > VPN? > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
