I don't understand why anyone should bother putting Exchange on a SAN unless it is a big SAN full of disks and the storage is virtualized across all of them. Unfortunately, many customers just buy their shelves and disks separately for each application and they ultimately end up with something that doesn't perform any better than direct-attach storage but costs a lot more.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a SAN Hi all .... We are going to be purchasing a low/mid end SAN and plan on moving our Exchange Back End Server Storage to it ... Comments? Things to read? Experiences? Choices of SAN? Thanks in advance ... Mike Wohlgemuth "To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research" - Steven Wright _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
