So, did you have a point?

(aside from "I'm right, you're wrong.  If I say it enough times, you *will*
understand"?)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 21:43 PM
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


> I will state this again for the 11 millionth and 1 time now. Accepting
> direct gifts from third parties, especially significant gifts such as
> large dollar items and titles, presents a real or perceived conflict of
> interest between an IT professional's client (either the customer or
> company that he or she works for) and that third party.
>
> This is the most very basic definition of conflict of interest. One cannot
> serve two masters. If you have been given something, and ESPECIALLY if it
> is something significant that can be taken away, then it presents a
> conflict of interest. This, from an ethical, perspective is wrong.
>
> This is the logic and the conclusion. It is as simple as that. It is not
> only what I believe but WHY I believe it. If someone can prove to me that
> this argument is illogical or flawed in some way, then I would believe
> something else. I am not close-minded or stubborn. Thus far, nobody has
> proven this argument to be flawed in any way. A lot of personal attacks, I
> have been called a wife beater, a liar and someone who starves children,
> but no one has refuted this most basic argument. I have never wavered from
> this argument, this has been the argument since the beginning that this
> all started. This is why companies tell their employees that they must
> send back gifts in excess of a certain dollar amount. This is BASIC
> ETHICS.
>
> Regardless of whether MCSE is unethical or whatever crazy argument you
> want to throw at it, this is basic ethics people. If you want to change my
> mind, then prove the above argument false. Simple as that.
>
> Now, I don't bring this stuff up. All it causes is this kind of craziness.
> Other people bring this stuff up. Exactly why is a mystery to me. Look at
> the subject of this message thread for Christ's sake. Are you kidding me?
> And it is not like I even threw in one of my whimsical Microsoft barbs. If
> someone is going to bring this stuff up, I am always, ALWAYS going to
> stick to this perspective and explain things the way I see them. Nobody
> has proven this logic wrong in 8 years. But, hey, I'm willing to think
> that someone might. There may be a flaw in there somewhere, that I do not
> see.
>
> And all this nonsense about "tone" and stating things as "my opinion" is
> all crap, a waste of bytes and besides the point. People read what they
> want to read in my posts, plain and simple. What is straight talk to one
> person is rude to another. What is polite to one is rambling, annoying and
> pointless to another. There are way too many people in this world to try
> to please so I speak in my own voice. It is a matter of fact voice that
> sticks to known facts and logic. If you are offended by my posts, well,
> there is not much I can do. I am not going to worry over every word and
> sentence for perfect structure and politeness. I simply do not have the
> time.
>
> > First of all, from a grammatical point-of-view, you only need to state
that
> > it is your opinion at the beginning of a paragraph or passage because it
is
> > fundamentally understood that follows the first phrase or sentence
further
> > backs up your opinion.
> >
> > It is my opinion that you are more worried about reveling in your moral
and
> > symantec righteousness than achieving the mental clarity to realize that
> > your 1200 word marathon responses make you look like a total prat.  But
that
> > is just my opinion.
> >
> > Disagreement is a necessary part of life and the human condition.  If we
all
> > got along, we'd all think the same way and life would get very dull.
You
> > can disagree with someone (even with Ed) without saying they are wrong.
> > This is the difference between stating a fact vs. opinion.  By saying
that
> > someone is wrong, you are implying that you are correct and your reasons
are
> > based upon fact or accepted truth.
> >
> > Allrightythen!  I guess this means that we aren't due to bring this
topic up
> > until June.  Thanks for the comic relief, Greg!
> >
> > Eric Fretz
> >
> > L-3 Communications
> > ComCept Division
> > 2800 Discovery Blvd.
> > Rockwall, TX 75032
> > tel:   972.772.7501
> > fax:  972.772.7510
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 12:50 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
> >
> >
> > In my opinion, there are those with the opinion that stating anything as
a
> > fact and not an opinion is abrasive and rude. In my opinion, this
opinion is
> > absurd because it is fundamentally understood that anything that comes
out
> > of anyone's mouth is simply an opinion and not a fact. In my opinion,
there
> > may be some people with the opinion that people should not go around
stating
> > their opinions. But, in my opinion, everyone has opinions and it gets
rather
> > monotonous and boring to keep stating "in my opinion" all the time when,
in
> > my opinion, it should be understood that everything is an opinion.
> >
> > In my opinion, people have opinions about lots of things that they
consider
> > facts. In my opinion, there are many that hold the opinion that the
earth is
> > round. But, in my opinion, this is simply an opinion as, in my opinion,
> > there are others that hold the opinion that the earth is flat. In my
> > opinion, this all depends on your opinion of the words "earth", "round"
and
> > "flat". In my opinion, if, in your opinion, the word "round" refers to a
> > 2-dimensional circular object, then, in my opinion, your opinion would
be
> > that the earth is not round since, in my opinion, your opinion would be
that
> > the earth would be a sphere, and not round. Of couse, in my opinion, if
your
> > opinion was that a sphere is perfectly symmetrical such that all points
on
> > its surface are equal distance from its center, then, in my opinion,
your
> > opinion about the earth being a sphere might be wrong since, in my
opinion,
> > there are those that hold the opinion that the earth is not a perfect
sphere
> > but is actually a bit elliptical in shape. In addition, in my opinion,
there
> > are elevation variations on the surface of the earth as well which would
> > mean that, in my opinion, the earth does not meet the definition of a
sphere
> > if your opinion is that a sphere means that all points on the surface of
a
> > 3-d object are equal distance from its center.
> >
> > Now, of course, in my opinion, this is all just my opinion. But, in my
> > opinion, the bigger concern here is that, in your opinion, are you happy
> > now?
> >
> > > I was not arguing with you about the symantics between fact & opinion,
> > > just rather pointing out that you tend to assert your opinions as
> > > fact.  That is a very abrasive personality trait and probably explains
> > > why the discussion list has reacted to you the way that they have.
> > >
> > > Eric Fretz
> > >
> > > L-3 Communications
> > > ComCept Division
> > > 2800 Discovery Blvd.
> > > Rockwall, TX 75032
> > > tel:   972.772.7501
> > > fax:  972.772.7510
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> >
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> > =english
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to