There has to be some type of consideration given to OWA users. As others have mentioned, I always "thought" that you did not need a separate CAL for OWA if you already had one for that users work machine/mailbox. You may want to speak to your vendor again and bring up that exact scenario that Neils mentions. It really does sound silly how they are explaining their licensing. Ben Winzenz, MCSE -----Original Message-----
That would only fix half of the problem. A single OWA-enabled user can access his OWA account from any Internet-connected PC in the world!
I'd *hate* to pay MS for that many CALs... :-)
/\/iels
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm |
Title: RE: OWA usage
- RE: OWA usa... Martin Blackstone
- RE: OWA usa... Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
- RE: OWA usa... Benjamin Winzenz
- RE: OWA usa... Lefkovics, William
- RE: OWA usa... Leone, Michael
- RE: OWA usa... Leone, Michael
- RE: OWA usa... Lefkovics, William
- RE: OWA usa... Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
- RE: OWA usa... Brent Hudson
- RE: OWA usa... Niels Christiansen
- RE: OWA usa... Benjamin Winzenz
- RE: OWA usa... Martin Blackstone
- RE: OWA usa... Benjamin Winzenz
- RE: OWA usa... Lefkovics, William
- RE: OWA usa... Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
- Re: OWA usa... Jeffegg
- RE: OWA usa... Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
- RE: OWA usa... Ellery July
- RE: OWA usa... Ellery July
- RE: OWA usa... Andy Cottrell
- RE: OWA usa... Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.