Yuck....you definitely want to dedicate spindles to your Exchange server if
at all possible. Sounds like you may have identified the performance
problem.

We're running our Exchange server off a similiar setup as yours (CX700,
switched fabric, etc.)  Did you partition your Exchange LUNs using Diskpart?
(create partition primary align=64). What switches are present in your
boot.ini?  The following have worked well for our server which matches yours
almost identically hardware wise: /3GB /USERVA=3030 /MAXMEM=4096.

- Sean


On 2/11/08, Robb Pickinpaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, I've got a lot to do and sort through.
>
> Also the comments about the SAN volumes causing my issue... they may be
> closer than I initially thought.
>
> One of our other production systems is sharing the disks that my Exchange
> LUN is living on... that users on that system have been running processes
> that are pounding the system pretty hard, including the disk, and this all
> started last Friday.
>
> Coincidence??? probably not.
>
> I'll keep digging, now at least I have directions to dig that may give me
> good answers.
>
> Thanks a bunch.
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to