Answering myself...

Doesn't seem to be the issue.

However, I do note that the site connector in the US office has the
5.5 box as the remote bridgehead, and that there is no queue in the US
server pointing to the 2003 box. How do I change that, so I can
decommission the 5.5 server when the time comes?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One other thing, which might not be important, but I don't know...
>
>  In ESM, under 
> UKSite/Servers/Servername/Connectors/USSiteConnector/Properties/Remote
>  Bridgehead: I show that the server name of the US server is just the
>  bare NetBOIS name - not the FQDN. Would this make a difference?
>
>
>  On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>
>
> > All,
>  >
>  >  As the message above states, the Site Connector queue is filling -
>  >  this is the one on the new UK server. When I highlight the queue, the
>  >  additional queue information box at the bottom says "Unable to bind to
>  >  the destination server in DNS."
>  >
>  >  Last night I moved all of the mailboxes from the 5.5 box over, no issues.
>  >
>  >  I've done some web searching, and checked the settings for the Default
>  >  SMTP Virtual Server, under the Delivery/Advanced/Configure/External
>  >  DNS field, and it's empty. I tried adding in the IP address of the
>  >  local DC, and no go.
>  >
>  >  At the console of the new Exchange box I did 'dcdiag /s:newdc' and it
>  >  passed all tests except for some ntfrs errors that came about because
>  >  of lost connectivity this morning.
>  >
>  >  I noticed that I didn't have SP2 installed, so installed it a few
>  >  minutes ago, and rebooted the box for luck - after notifying users, of
>  >  course.
>  >
>  >  Funny thing is, this site is receiving mail, it just can't send it -
>  >  to anywhere.
>  >
>  >  The 5.5 box was set up to route all mail to the US for disposition,
>  >  and this box should do the same.
>  >
>  >  Iv'e downloladed and am currently running the ntfrsdiag tool anyway,
>  >  just for fun, but I'm not seeing any reasons why mail isn't heading
>  >  out.
>  >
>  >  Many Thanks,
>  >
>  >  Kurt
>  >
>  >  ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>  >  ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>  >
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to