Slightly related is this as well : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;295653
Pretty sure the bit about NDR's not being delivered to public folders holds for "normal" NDR delivery, as well as redirected/copied NDR's described in the article. Thanks Rob ----- Original Message ---- From: Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, 12 June, 2008 9:00:10 PM Subject: Re: Can Public Folders receive NDR failure reports? Thank you very much Peter! My Google-Fu is slipping.. I didnt come up with anything close to the KB article. Thanks! On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Dahl, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The ndr is deleted by Exchange. If you turn up logging you can see the basic > information about what message was deleted but it is not as detailed as an > NDR would be. > > Check the More information section of this article. > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900088/en-us > > Thanks, > Peter Dahl. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:19 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Can Public Folders receive NDR failure reports? > > Right. But how about in this case: > > The message is being originated from a web-app, being sent via an > authenticated connection to my Exchange server. Failure NDRs do not > seem to be landing back to the return-path (assigned to a public > folder). > > However, status delay NDRs do. Its just the failure replies that seem > to not. I'm perplexed to say the least. > > If a PF can indeed accept a failure NDR, then my next guess is that > the 'envelope sender' used by the .NET hook is perhaps different that > what the web guys configured as the return-path... > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are you talking mail enabled folders? usually it is the person who sends as >> that gets the NDR... >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> ::Exchange 2003 >>> >>> From what I am seeing, the answer is no - but I never would have >>> guesses this would be true. >>> >>> Is there a reghack I need to apply in order to receive >>> server-generated NDR failures? Odd thing is that delay status >>> messages appear to work fine, but failure messages do not. >>> >>> TIA! >>> >>> -- >>> ME2 >>> >>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ >>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ >> >> > > > > -- > ME2 > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are > not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, > (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this > communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be > unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
