yep yep, but thanks for passing this along.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 4:01 AM, ROBERT WILCOX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Slightly related is this as well : > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;295653 > > Pretty sure the bit about NDR's not being delivered to public folders holds > for "normal" NDR delivery, as well as redirected/copied NDR's described in > the article. > > Thanks > Rob > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, 12 June, 2008 9:00:10 PM > Subject: Re: Can Public Folders receive NDR failure reports? > > Thank you very much Peter! My Google-Fu is slipping.. I didnt come > up with anything close to the KB article. > > Thanks! > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Dahl, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The ndr is deleted by Exchange. If you turn up logging you can see the >> basic information about what message was deleted but it is not as detailed >> as an NDR would be. >> >> Check the More information section of this article. >> >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900088/en-us >> >> Thanks, >> Peter Dahl. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:19 PM >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: Can Public Folders receive NDR failure reports? >> >> Right. But how about in this case: >> >> The message is being originated from a web-app, being sent via an >> authenticated connection to my Exchange server. Failure NDRs do not >> seem to be landing back to the return-path (assigned to a public >> folder). >> >> However, status delay NDRs do. Its just the failure replies that seem >> to not. I'm perplexed to say the least. >> >> If a PF can indeed accept a failure NDR, then my next guess is that >> the 'envelope sender' used by the .NET hook is perhaps different that >> what the web guys configured as the return-path... >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Are you talking mail enabled folders? usually it is the person who sends >>> as >>> that gets the NDR... >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> ::Exchange 2003 >>>> >>>> From what I am seeing, the answer is no - but I never would have >>>> guesses this would be true. >>>> >>>> Is there a reghack I need to apply in order to receive >>>> server-generated NDR failures? Odd thing is that delay status >>>> messages appear to work fine, but failure messages do not. >>>> >>>> TIA! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ME2 >>>> >>>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ >>>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ME2 >> >> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ >> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ >> >> >> This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you >> are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to >> others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete >> this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be >> unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ >> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ >> > > > > -- > ME2 > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
