Just an opinion, but if your going that route, use Raid 6 if your controller 
does it.
Your scenario puts you in jeopardy the moment one drive fails, as during the 
rebuild your not redundant.
In Raid 6, two can go and bring you down to zero ft which is no worse than what 
you would have your way accept it can happen faster without loosing it all.

jlc

From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5

Haha yup sorry bout  that, Webster is correct 8 Drives Plus One Hot Spare, all 
Fiber 15K

From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5


From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5

Is it safe to assume that you meant RAID 5+1?

If not.....what is RAID 8?
I believe he means RAID5 configured as 8 drives plus 1 hot spare.

Webster




_________________________________________________________
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other privileges.
This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not
an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including
attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and delete
the original message and any attachments from your system.
_________________________________________________________




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to