I can't remember that far back but iirc upgrading to 4.1 might have handled this. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud
----- Original Message ----- From: Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com> Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:42:12 2009 Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour? I'll ask - what patches might apply? I don't administer that box. On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:31, John Cook <john.c...@pfsf.org> wrote: > Was the BES server patched? > John W. Cook > Systems Administrator > Partnership For Strong Families > Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com> > Sent: Thu Mar 26 17:31:07 2009 > Subject: Re: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour? > > We're having this issue with a number of people, and the majority of > them are using Blackberries - but not all of them. > > Come to think of it, the ones who are affected but aren't using BBs > are the Exec assistants, IIRC. > > Got a line on something? > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43, Campbell, Rob > <rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net> wrote: >> Any chance the ones that are off were accepted from a PDA? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul [mailto:paul...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:31 PM >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >> Subject: Inconsistent Meeting Times...off by one hour? >> >> I am helping out a company that is having a problem with some meeting >> invitations they receive being off by one hour. I would assume this is a >> DST issue, but it isn't consistent. If they send out a meeting request it >> is correct and most of the ones they receive are correct however a handful >> are coming in with the time one hour late. I thought it was the person >> sending the requests since the ones they receive incorrectly are always from >> the same people so I had the person send a request to an account on the >> clients server and to an account on a separate Exchange server and that >> request was incorrect for the client, but correct on the separate server. >> I'm stumped. How can they be seeing the correct time for 90% of their >> meeting invites and incorrectly for the remaining 10% yet also be able to >> send a meeting request to the same people who are sending the bad ones and >> those people see it correctly? >> The client is running Outlook 2007 on Windows XP with an Exchange 2003 >> server. Are there any known issues or settings that could cause this type >> of inconsistent behavior? Also the meeting invitations are not for >> recurring meetings. >> >> Thanks >> Paul >> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ >> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ >> >> ************************************************************************************************** >> Note: >> The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential >> and >> protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended >> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to >> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, >> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you >> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. >> ************************************************************************************************** >> >> >> >> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ >> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ >> >> > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or > attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), > confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, > dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this > information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without > the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information > may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act > of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized > use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal > penalties. > Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really > need to. > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
