Do you remember "way back when"? When NT 3.5 and 4.0 came out, Microsoft told us NTFS didn't need defragging....thus was born a new industry. :-)
-----Original Message----- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Defragmenting servers The really old school notion is to have a file system that doesn't need it, like UFS... Heh. On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:45, David.Ricci <david.ri...@hwinstitute.com> wrote: > I was always under the impression that it was bad to defrag a server. > I guess that was an old school notion. > > > > > David M. Ricci > IS Manager > The Health & Wellness Institute > 291 Promenade Street > Providence, RI 02908 > T: 401.228.1332 > C: 401.256.4933 > F: 401.228.1399 > www.hwinstitute.com > david.ri...@hwinstitute.com > > SERVICE. INNOVATION. RESULTS. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:00 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Defragmenting servers > > It provides a marginal speed improvement (assuming you defrag > regularly). > > I like MyDefrag (used to be JKDefrag). It's free and it's fast. > > -----Original Message----- > From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:47 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Defragmenting servers > > Does anyone use tools like diskeeper to defrag their nondatabase > servers? Is it recommended? > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking any action in > reliance on the information contained in this e-mail is prohibited. If > you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify our > e-mail administrator at supp...@hwinstitute.com.
