I worked for Higher Ed for a while, and we never used that approach either.
It is definitely extreme.  There is certainly more than one way to skin a
cat, but this definitely isn't the way I would choose.

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Jason Gurtz <jasongu...@npumail.com> wrote:

> Schools are a unique I.T. environment to be sure, but wow they sure don't
> use this rebuild-from-scratch approach at the schools around here!
>
> I've found software development to be amazingly similar to the practice of
> I.T.  There's a guy out there (used to work in the Excel bus. unit at MS)
> who has blogged extensively on best practices, etc... and this post from
> almost exactly 10 years and a month ago seems remarkably apropos:
> http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html
>
> Just substitute:
>    users for customers...
>    applications for functions/APIs...
>    fixing something for reading code
>    starting over for writing code
>    etc...
>
> ~JasonG
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:ashie...@epsteinatlanta.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:37
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>  > Subject: [M] [MARKETING] RE: Upgrade to 2010 first?
> >
> > It's what we do in the school to maintain and improve our technology.
> We
> > rebuild, recreate and improve on what we had, deploy new
> > hardware/software, improve infrastructure.
> >
> >
> >
> > Instead of tacking things on down the road-during the year, we rebuild -
> > incorporating all of those things during the summer.
> >
> >
> >
> > We repurpose servers.  What once was high volume, no longer needs the
> > super server.  What once was a physical server, is now a virtual server.
> >
> >
> >
> > Unlike corporate world, we attempt to leave our stuff untouched during
> > the school year.  For the summer break, we get to start fresh when
> > downtime is near irrelevant.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Anthony Shields
> >
> > Systems Administrator
> >
> > The Epstein School
> >
> > (404) 250-5659
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:31 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: Upgrade to 2010 first?
> >
> >
> >
> > My suggestion would be to not rebuild the domain.  What are the reasons
> > behind this?
> >
> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Shields, Anthony
> > <ashie...@epsteinatlanta.org> wrote:
> >
> > Nearly every summer we rebuild our domain from scratch, including
> > Exchange.  This year, we will be upgrading several things including
> > Win2k8 R2 and E2k10 server.
> >
> >
> >
> > Typically when we do this, we exmerge the existing store - in this case
> a
> > E2k7 - to PST files, which are then exmerged into the new store.
> >
> >
> >
> > We currently have many users with mailboxes near or over 2gigs.  I have
> > had issues previously trying to import large PST files and am hoping to
> > avoid them if possible.
> >
> >
> >
> > I believe E2k10 has brought back the ease of export/import PST files and
> > was wondering if it would make sense to upgrade the E2k7 server to 2010
> > and then export the PST files - Wipe the equipment clean and reinstall
> > 2010, importing those PST files?
> >
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts or suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Anthony Shields
> >
> > Systems Administrator
> >
> > The Epstein School
> >
> > (404) 250-5659
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > The Epstein School is a proud beneficiary of the Jewish Federation of
> > Greater Atlanta.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to