I've always had it set to global for our 200 users. Just go in every once in a while when to much starts slipping through and classify some ham and spam manually and forget it for another 6 months. I'll have users complain they got a spam or two today and I just tell them they are welcome that I stopped the other 7000 we blocked and they shut up.
________________________________ From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Barracuda Expertise I don't use the Outlook plugin, and opt to manage the quarantine globally (we're a small shop with ~50 users). In that configuration there is no way that an individual's Outlook settings can affect what the Barracuda does. I also seriously doubt that the Outlook plugin can cause changes to the Barracuda's settings, but I don't know for sure since I've never deployed it. I have been cracking down hard on spam over the last several months after getting a complaint from the company owner that his inbox was receiving too much junk. My current settings are to tag anything with a score of 2 to 2.9, quarantine 3 to 5.9, and block above 6. I have the quarantined emails delivered to me and I release and mark the false positives. It's a minor pain to deal with, but the amount of spam getting through is down to a trickle. I also block using Barracuda IP reputation (b.barracudacentral.org), bl.spamcop.net, dnsbl.sorbs.net, and zen.spamhaus.org. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Roger Wright <rhw...@gmail.com> wrote: Our org has a Barracuda at the gateway. We're having issues with too much spam leaking through to some users' mailboxes. The email admins seem to think that enabling Outlook's anti-phishing option only (not the junk mail filters) may be causing the Barracuda to filter inadequately. I'm confused... why/how/could Outlook settings impact a gateway device? Roger Wright ___ When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't nothin' like it!
