________________________________

        From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu] 
        Sent: 17 June 2011 17:24
        To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 design
        
        

        That looks like a good paper, and the solution looks
appropriate. 

        One thing to make sure you're aware of when using NLB; you can't
have NLB and Windows Clustering on the same server. So if you are using
NLB for your CAS and you think you may want to use DAG for your mailbox
server(s), the roles will have to be on separate servers.

         

It has a neat solution to that. It uses four virtual servers on two
physical boxes.....

         

         

        DAMIEN SOLODOW

        Systems Engineer

        317.447.6033 (office)

        317.447.6014 (fax)

        HARRISON COLLEGE

         

        From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:l...@cem.dur.ac.uk] 
        Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:55 AM
        To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 design

         

        Thanks for the replies, they set me off on a lot of reading.
Unfortunatly I've been told that a hardware load balancer is out of the
question at the moment, but I did find this link for a highly available
500 mailbox design
(http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=e0e93251-fc
04-4a18-8aa0-23817b6d0c97) in my list archive, for an MS white paper
which seems to describe an implementation that would fit with what I've
been required to do.

         

        My only question would be, how "real world" are these white
papers, if I followed a similar route would I end up with a practical
solution?

        Thanks again,

        Laurence

         

        
________________________________


        From: Neil Hobson [mailto:neil.hob...@microsoft.com] 
        Sent: 13 June 2011 15:30
        To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 design

        In addition to what Phil said in his reply, for a good overview
of the load balancing options I'd recommend reading this topic :
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff625247.aspx

         

        FYI, if you go down the hardware load balancer route, here's the
page that lists the hardware load balancers that have completed solution
testing with Exchange 2010 :
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/gg176682.aspx

         

        HTH,

         

        Neil

         

        From: Laurence Bryant [mailto:l...@cem.dur.ac.uk] 
        Sent: 13 June 2011 13:59
        To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
        Subject: Exchange 2010 design

         

        Hi Everyone,

         

        I'm a bit new to this so my apologies if I've not understood
something correctly. I'm trying to plan new hardware to deploy Exchange
2010 (100 users, average mailbox size 500MB) and am looking at using two
servers with CAS, HT and Mailbox roles installed on both and using DAG
for high availability. I was thinking of using Windows NLB for load
balancing,but have read that this can't be used with DAG
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd979781.aspx). My question
is, if I set up two additional servers with NLB installed and moved the
CAS and HT roles to them, would this solution then provide the load
balancing I'm looking for?

         

        Alternatively, would I be better off with two highly redundant
servers and use one for Mailbox and one for CAS and HT?

         

        Thanks for any advice!

         

        Laurence

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
        with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
        with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
        with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
        with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist




**********************************************************************
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to disclose this 
email,  or any response to it,  under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, 
unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in the Act. 

If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport ICT, Corporate & 
Support Services via email.qu...@stockport.gov.uk and then permanently remove 
it from your system. 

Thank you.

http://www.stockport.gov.uk
**********************************************************************


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Reply via email to