So technically, once SSL is requested, it hits your Kemp boxes and it
passes it along to each CAS box for processing?

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:01 PM, <pramatow...@mediageneral.com> wrote:

>  We're not using them for SSL- we tried for a bit, unfortunately the
> reason for not doing so escapes me right now, It wasn't a performance hit
> They're great little units, pretty much set and forget.
> I'll post back why we're not doing it as soon as I remember...
>
> Blackberry
>
>  *From*: Walker, Michael [mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org]
> *Sent*: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 08:05 PM
> *To*: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> *Cc*: Ramatowski, Paul M.
> *Subject*: RE: Load Balancers?
>
>
> Are you using your LM2200s for SSL?  If so, have you had any performance
> issues?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you!                    ****
>
> ** **
>
> *Michael Walker*****
>
> *Senior Network Engineer*****
>
> Citrus Valley Health Partners****
>
> 140 W. College Street, Covina, CA  91723****
>
> *Phone/Fax/Pager: (888) 299-6882*****
>
> *mwal...@mail.cvhp.org* <mwal...@mail.cvhp.org>****
>
> *From:* pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com]
>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 03, 2011 8:17 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Load Balancers?****
>
> ** **
>
> We did windows nlb for a while but moved to Kemp in June.****
>
> 2 sites, each has:****
>
> 3 virtual CAS****
>
> 2hub/MBX servers ****
>
> 3 copy dag, each DB has 2 copies in site, one across site.****
>
> ~7K mailboxes, 1400 Blackberries, a few hundred EAS devices.****
>
> ** **
>
> From my post on this back in June     ****
>
> *WNLB at first-*
>
> We went WNLB for a couple of reasons- $ and it was supported "happily"
>  for our size/needs.  Pretty sure it still is but MS doesn't seem to like
> it nearly as much as they used to-I'd guess based on real world
> experience?  Today,  those size/needs would steer towards HLB.****
>
>  ****
>
> IIRC it was a pain for us to set up and get going properly- whether that
> was WNLB, me, or just all the #$^! that was going on at the time, I dunno.
> Once it was going I guess it LB's well enough *as long as all the boxes
> were up*. not that it was a regular occurrence by any means but if we
> lost/had to reboot a box it did screw with all the connections on that box.
> Had to fiddle with patching too (drainstopping etc) but so it goes.****
>
> Also unless we missed something obvious, the only health checking you have
> is basically a ping test, HLB goes past that. ****
>
>  ****
>
> *Kemp, once we got some extra $*
>
> Have two 2200 Loadmasters in each site.****
>
> ** **
>
> Stuff I've done resulting in 0 client complaints-****
>
> Pulled power on the active Kemp****
>
> Rebooted a CAS****
>
> Powered down CAS****
>
>  ****
>
> *new stuff to report since June- *
>
> ** **
>
> Patching, rebooting, doing anything to a CAS is pretty much a non-event as
> far as users go.  ****
>
> [1] Disable a CAS on the Kemp, all connections automatically go to the
> “up” servers. ****
>
> [2] Do what you need to do, enable on the Kemp. ****
>
> [3] Watch that it behaves, lather rinse repeat..****
>
> The few times we had to talk to Kemp while configuring and setting up the
> devices they were very quick to respond and follow up.  Since then the
> boxes have been 100%. Nothing but nice things to say about them…****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com <pmaglin...@scvl.com>]
>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 03, 2011 9:28 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Load Balancers?****
>
> ** **
>
> We are, but we are just at the beginning of our pilot program and haven’t
> done load testing.  Failover works just fine though.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Brian McGloin [mailto:sms...@gmail.com <sms...@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 03, 2011 8:11 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Load Balancers?****
>
> ** **
>
> Is anyone using the Windows 2008 Server NLB?
> Experiences?
>
> Thx in advance****
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Michael B. Smith <mich...@smithcons.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Kemp is a good choice, as is Coyote Point.****
>
>  ****
>
> If you have lots of money, you can also consider Citrix, Cisco, and F5.***
> *
>
>  ****
>
> Regards,****
>
>  ****
>
> Michael B. Smith****
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP****
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 03, 2011 8:48 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Load Balancers?****
>
>  ****
>
> I’m starting to think and plan for adding a second Exchange 2010 server
> and setting up a DAG and CAS array.****
>
>  ****
>
> I know of Kemp, but I’m not familiar with any other vendor when it comes
> to load balancers.  Obviously I can whack it into Google (and have) but on
> the face of it they all do what I currently want.****
>
>  ****
>
> Any personal recommendations (or nightmares) would be great.****
>
>  ****
>
> A virtual load balancer also sounds like an option as we have a vSphere
> cluster that should be able to run a pair of appliances in HA.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Paul****
>  ------------------------------
>
> *MIRA Ltd*****
>
>  ****
>
> Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England****
>
> Registered in England and Wales No. 402570****
>
> VAT Registration  GB 100 1464 84****
>
>  ****
>
> The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of
> the intended recipient.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete
> it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax.  You should not copy,
> forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is
> prohibited.****
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist****
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist****
>
>
>
>
> --
> smsadm****
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist****
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist****
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist****
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Reply via email to