Mike Cardwell wrote: > > "Many people on the Exim mailing lists refuse to answer questions posted > with obfuscated logs or configuration files. If you post obfuscated > details on the mailing list, you may receive a reply directing you to > this page. If you repost your question with unobfuscated logs and > configuration files, you are a lot more likely to get a helpful answer > from the members of the Exim mailing lists." > > That's misleading. It should say: > > "_A minority_ of people on the Exim mailing lists refuse to answer > questions posted with obfuscated logs or configuration files. If > you post obfuscated details on the mailing list, you may receive > a reply directing you to this page. If you repost your question > with unobfuscated logs and configuration files, you are _very > slightly_ more likely to get a helpful answer from the members > of the Exim mailing lists."
I recommend that we put this to a simple vote, with a ban on commentary along with votes, to avoid the heated tempers that often arise when this subject comes up. My vote: keep it the way it is (obviously -- I wrote that paragraph). - Marc -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
