Jean-Louis Debert wrote:
>
> "Eric L. Brine" wrote:>
> > > One comment here. You should be using an "experimental" network per RFC
> > > 1597, not just any old network. There is a legal Class A network, one or
> > > more legal Class B networks, and there are several legal Class C
> > > networks. I don't recall offhand the legal class A network, but I don't
> > > think it is 90.0.0.0. One of the legal class C networks is 192.168.1.0,
> > > which is what I use.
> >
> > I don't know for what reasons, but 90.0.0.x is guaranteed not to be
> > routed, so it's not "just any old network". At least, that's what some old
> > tool told me, and it happened to be the one to which I was introduced
> > before 192.168.1.*.
>
> 90.0.0.x is just _unassigned_ currently (it's reserved to IANA).
> It is _not_ "guaranteed" to stay that way or "not to be routed".
>
> The reference for networks "guaranteed" not to be routed (the
> correct naming is "private networks"), is RFC 1918
> (which obsoletes RFC 1597).
>
> See http://www.csl.sony.co.jp/rfc/
>
> For class A networks, the legal private network address is 10.x.y.z,
> not 90 ...
*CHEERS*
Sense prevails!
Merci, Jean-Louis =)
-Stephen-
