Ellick Chan wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > 3) used 'kpackage' instead of the program you used because 'kpackage' is > > what is used to INSTALL RPM's with. > > > I disagree, rpm is the right tool for the job. It's the one that works > without X :) > that's correct. you would use rpm if you're installing the package from a terminal window, or if you don't have X running. I've become lazy though and don't always feel like writting out the entire package name. Plus, it was my intention in the thread at the time to let him know that the program he was attempting to use to install an rpm package at best can really try one's patience. -- Mark
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes !! (m... Ellick Chan
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes !! (m... Bill Hudspeth
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes !! (m... Stephen F. Bosch
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes !! (m... Bill Hudspeth
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes !! (m... Tony McGee
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes !! (m... Mark Weaver
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes ... Ellick Chan
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ inclu... Mark Weaver
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ i... Charles Curley
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes ... Doug McGarrett
- Re: [expert] $30 and 2 hours later, NO C++ includes !! (m... Sarang Lakare