> > Charles is right in that large sig blocks are frowned upon, and > > they are actually contrary to the netiquette FAQ. > > A netiquette FAQ? Where do I find that? The faq in question is rfc1855. I'll e-mail you a copy if you wish (privately - I'd be CRUCIFIED if I sent a 46k faq to the list!) > Thanks for the moral support! Your comments also apply to cutting > useless cruft out of messages as one responds to them. I couldn't agree more. Again, this is covered in the above faq (actually an rfc, but the two are usually interchangeable). Messages should be trimmed to contain enough for a reader new to the thread to be able to make sense of it, but no more. Regards, Ozz.
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
