it has another added benefit as well, I have mozilla 0.9.4 on linux and 0.9.6+ on windows, they are pretty damn similiar.. and I really love cross platform consistancy...
both work great. though I would like to upgrade to 0.9.6 on 8.1 without breaking anything.,.. but if its not possible, its not possible. (or at least not easy.) rgds Frank -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Weaver Sent: Monday, 17 December 2001 2:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] WYSIWYG HTML editor for Linux? On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:54:31 +0100 Wolfgang Bornath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> studiouisly spake these words to ponder: > Oh, last time I used Composer was with Netscape 4.7x. At that time the > output was a lot of crap. Has it improved since then? That would be a > reason for me to switch from Opera to Mozilla. > well, let me put it this way. I used to "hate" composing web pages with Netscape composter for the very reasons that most do. it wrote horrible code. however, when I took a look at the code that netscape 6.x composer made I was very pleasantly surprise at the clean code that was written. and the integration of the java-based code viewer is much nicer now too. since Netscape 6.x is based on Mozilla code I can only conclude that if Netscape 6.x is nice then Mozilla must be real nice. I guess I'm going to have to download a copy and take a look-see. -- daRcmaTTeR Registered Linux User 182496 Mandrake 8.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 12:05pm up 3:46, 2 users, load average: 0.82, 0.71, 0.61
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
