-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Mark Watts wrote on Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 04:26:02PM +0000 : > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > <snip> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQE+HvQaBn4EFUVUIO0RAk2+AJ9LuSiutz2npZLSJaDBWnvW+06EXwCfb4+V > > WM/uO0C/uNNiuWGP4pFKrjI= > > =NrDF > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Mark, your messages are not recognized by mutt as being signed messages. > I can tell this because I can see your pgp sig as quoted above instead > of being verified. Could we do some offlist email exchanges to see what > is the culprit in this? I can see possibly filing a bug report to the > mutt guys. > > When I send messages, I'm using inline signing as well. Does your mail > client show that it's signed or no? > > Blue skies... Todd
Strange... Any mail that I send to a list (cooker,expert,qmail etc) all appears (to me) to be signed properly. I'm using the kmail that comes with 9.0 (1.4.3). All my messages (and others which are signed) have the nice coloured borders, and those keys that I've signed are comping up as so. Interestingly, the message I am replying to is not signed, wheras the other one from Todd further down this thread is signed. Not sure whats going on. Mark. P.S. My key isn't on any keyserver, which is what the bit at the bottom of my sig is for :) (I'm behind a squid proxy and I haven't got gpg to play nice with it yet) - -- Mark Watts Systems Engineer QinetiQ TIM St Andrews Road, Malvern GPG Public Key available on request. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+IpG9Bn4EFUVUIO0RAhhsAJ9Ohv4EDFo5I6y9zdn1kaGqsJcG6ACbB5YL xyYIvla9JEe3MkKuVORfpak= =F8Ku -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
