Praedor: Wich compiler are you using?? I use to have problems with it a long time ago. Try to see wich are the options that the 2.4.19-24mdk.src.rpm package use to generate the binary package.
El Vie 21 Feb 2003 11:58, Praedor Atrebates escribió: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 20 February 2003 08:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote: > > On Thu Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:03AM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Have people actually managed to BUILD 2.4.19-24mdk and use it? Or are > > > you simply using the binary version. What did MandrakeSoft do to get > > > it to build and actually work, if this is the case? To what god(s) did > > > they offer sacrifice to so that it would work on any hardware at all? > > > > I built the 2.4.19-24mdk packages. They took a while, but they built > > (from rpm). I rebuilt them once from source as a test to make sure they > > built, but I don't recall if I booted from that compiled version or not. > > > > I have installed the binary package in vmware, on an "enterprise" > > machine, on an "smp" machine, and on an "up" machine. In all cases, > > everything worked just peachy. > > > > You seem to have a lot of problems with Linux that I just never come > > across. I see quite often you having problems with stuff on the list. > > Perhaps your luck just isn't very good. =) > > > > Seriously, a number of people tested this kernel before we put it out. > > We can't test every piece of hardware out there, but anything major we > > can usually spot quite quickly. I don't know why it doesn't work for > > you. > > The hardware is new but still old enough to have proven itself over time. > I have tried completely removing the source package, kernel modules > directory, source, etc, and then reinstalling the kernel-source rpm, and > redoing the build. > > I have always ultimately rebuilt my own kernels, first from tarballs and > more recently, from source rpms. It has only really been with 9.0 and the > 2.4.19+ kernels that I have had problems. I had to dump my XFS filesystem > to get a custom-built 2.4.19 9.0 kernel to work with my system (known issue > - the kernel makefile indicates that for xfs support - and thus the whole > kernel as a result, should be built with egcc?! Who uses that anymore? I > thought that it and gcc had been merged over a year ago). > > In any case, the harddrive is new, the system memory is sound, the CPU is > sound, the video card is sound (NVidia Ti4200). > > I was hoping someone would have run into this sort of kernel-uselessness > situation and also found a way out of it. I am reluctant to simply install > a binary kernel. They don't tend to work very well with my wireless > devices. > > praedor > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+Vj6cwDUPEkSvRHERAhirAJ9CS8kli7h97eqT6vg/pfAI38aelgCgjjKA > 8Bas4IMVBoJeJz8IuJKpb4c= > =SNpa > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ================================================================= Lic. Alfredo Carlos López INIFTA - UNLP Phone: +54-221-425 7430 Instituto de Investigaciones Fax: +54-221-425 4642 Fisicoquímicas Teórica y Aplicada. Suc. 4 C.C. 16 1900 La Plata, Argentina Calle 68 nro.74 (e118/119) Dto. 15 Phone: +54-221-423 6240 1900 La Plata, Argentina Cell-Phone: +54-221-(15) 455 0141 ================================================================= "One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that one's work is terribly important." - Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com