Marshall Lochbaum <mwlochbaum@...> writes:
>
>
> I figured there would be a word designed for that already... Here's my take on
this anyway.
> I would append the items to a sequence as the algorithm goes along:
> { } swap [ dup 1 > ] [ dup 2 /i [ suffix ] dip ] while suffixaccomplishes the
task.
>
> Marshall
Hi Marshall,
Yes, this works but I feel the two tasks are conceptually different and I didn't
want to interleave them. I wanted to do all the division as 1 job and then just
push the results as the 2nd job. This way the code stays simple and properly
factored.
Graham
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
