--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > anon replys to anon. hahaha. > > ================ > Enjoyable ;-) > > p.s. why does God make so many spelling mistakes? > > anon
Was it that bad? Did you manage to understand my drift though? Or is it that you are upset that I took *G-D's role*? We can switch, you know. :) Take care. > ================ > > > > Please see below: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > Becuase *someone* has/had to create that OS and that *someone* > is > > me. > > > > (or you..) > > > > > > ===== > > > But why must that be so? > > > > It's not a must, it's just is ! > > > > > Akasha does self-inquiry by which he determines that the whole > > human > > > mind/body mechanism can take care of itself and its interactions > > with > > > the world without there having to be an entity known as the > owner > > of > > > it > > > > That's fine what akasha doese, that is what he currently can do > from > > his ownOS version that he has. > > Abraham (from the Torah, Bible) did the same self-inquiry until he > > realized me as G-D; after realization he occupied himself in Self- > > inquiry. > > akasha can be involved in his self-inquiry as much as he wants but > > he can take a short cut (or can he not :) ) and do Self-inquiry. > > As I said it all depends upon his current OS version. :) > > > > (I take it back, he has to complete what we call self-inquiry > > before moving to Self-inquiry.) > > > > >, or identified with as the owner. > > > > > > > > Is the concept of an overarching localized owner something > learned? > > > > learned defintely. That is if I understand correctly what you > mean by > > " localized owner ". > > > > >Is it a false lesson learned? > > > > Yes (if I understand you correctly). The upgrades are starting > > from "scratch", meaning from self-inquiry and depend > > (from the self point of view) upon the self-inquiry learned > lessons. > > Thee learned lesson are realizations of what this "false" is but > not > > only. > > > > > Or could it be true, and still needs to be > > > learned? Or did we know it all along, innately, because, after > all, > > no > > > other possibility exists? > > > > right, no other possibility exists. > > It's for your (self) sake that these lessons needed to be learned. > > It is you ( small self ) that insisted on that learned process not > > ME. > > > > > > > > On what basis is one to decide? If the daily experience is > that "I > > > exist as a localized entity," then how can such a mind > contemplate > > its > > > own non-existence as an I, doer, knower, etc; > > > > by negation process, and by learned experience. The mind uses > > his own functions to do that. > > However the mind is not the issue, he doese his job smoothly. > > The *problem* is the ego, who is the obstacle that trics the mind > > to false ideas, conclusions and dellusions. > > There is were the struggle begins, otherwise it's no brainer for > the > > mind. :) > > > > > > >except to wander in > > > imagination based on the structure of experience that includes a > > > supposed I, doer etc. > > > > > > If, on the other hand, the daily experience is that "there is no > I" > > > doing anything. Things just happen, as they should. There never > has > > > been a pilot, though I thought at one time that there was. Then > how > > > could such a one capitulate to statements like "but there has to > be > > > someone who ..." > > > > Because both are true, there is pilot and there isn't a pilot, > more > > then that in *reality* there are two pilots you and I. ( the small > > self and the Big ) > > > > Duality ? Yes duality up to a point, up to a level, beacuse there > is > > duality in the non-dual depending on the level of abstraction. > > > > > > > > Are these kinds of disagreements semantic only? conceptual only? > Or > > > just due to fundamentally different experiences? > > > > > > > no, It's far from just semantic, imo. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
