On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:40 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2007, at 9:38 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander > > <mailander111@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > So there is no way DL can by summed up by MD. After all, he was > > > equally capable when he did The Straight Story. Did he suddenly > > > get cured of his vata imbalance? Like any artist, he simply > > > assumes a different narrative stance for different works. > > > > I'm with you on this one, Angela. It's very important > > to Vaj to be able to portray a TMer who has achieved > > great success as somehow having been damaged by TM, > > so you're not likely to get a rational argument from > > him. > > Another lie from Judy. Well, that's two lies from Vaj in a mere four words. As Vaj knows, I don't lie. I haven't lied before, and I wasn't lying here.
ROFLOL! I don't know where you got that idea. I've watched you hurl lies for YEARS (mostly at Barry).
> Actually I never said that. And, of course, I never *said* Vaj said that. The word I used was "portrayed." There are lots of ways to portray something a certain way without actually articulating it, including by misleading one's audience. In this case, Vaj's interesting term "meditational disorder," given that Lynch is a TMer, was obviously intended to suggest--without actually saying so--that Lynch's purported "imbalance" is caused by TM. So Vaj's denial here is another lie. And here comes yet another one: > I indicated that's it's likely a condition > that existed before TM Here's what Vaj said: "In Lynch there are clear signs of vata derangement and IMO, very likely, an underlying yogic disorder. This probably precedes his involvement in TM, but would certainly be exacerbated by anything that tweaks or increases vata-dosha." The clear implication is that Lynch had a predisposition to "vata derangement" prior to starting TM, but that it had been exacerbated *by* TM into a "yogic" (or, later, "meditational") disorder. Hard to imagine a yogic or meditational disorder developing in someone who didn't meditate.
But, nonetheless, I did mention a preexisting disorder. Nice try to obfuscate and misdirect, but no cigar.
And we know Vaj believes TM and the TM-Sidhi program brings about "vata derangement." OK, ready for another lie from Vaj?
Another? There was no first one. Stop lying Judy!
> and that he had actually improved over time! <snort> Vaj attributed Lynch's "improvement" not to TM, but to panchakarma:
A TM movement based PK program. Lynch attributes his improvement to TM. TM is part of the ayurvedic approach of Maharishi Ayurveda (as Judy knows), since it considers the "mistake of the intellect" basic to doshic imbalance arising in the first place.
But Judy already knew that. Just another obfuscation and misdirection.
"I will say one thing, it does seem to have improved somewhat over the years. He's probably doing ongoing PK thru the movement, which provides an excellent level of care and service (although exorbitantly expensive)."
Actually what I say is it was expensive and they provide a good care. Again, Judy lying about lying. Does that make you a meta-liar?
> Now whether or not TM has truly helped the condition is a good > question. He claims it has. Maybe you buy that, maybe you don't. Of course, like any skilled propagandist, he pretends to be uncertain about the conclusion he has attempted to mislead his audience to draw--a show of open-mindedness designed to give, as Pooh-Bah assures Ko-Ko in "The Mikado," "artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative."
LOL, you read WAY to much into casual speech my dear! Not even close, (as Judy deliberately does to try to manufacture "lies").
Such childishness.
Whenever Vaj accuses somebody--especially me--of lying, it's time to pay *very* close attention indeed to his claims.
Judy, we see you doing it to Barry almost daily. Why would anyone be surprised? It's chronic!
