--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Marek,
> 
> If weed was legal, there'd be weed growing in every ditch -- they
> wouldn't get nearly the taxes that they're getting for alcohol and
> tobacco.

I still think many a lazy ass would rather buy it then grow it.


> 
> The hemp industry however would greatly benefit the economy.
> 
> As far as I can tell, the law against pot is a racist tool to imprison
> African Americans....plain and simple.

I think maybe crack fits a racist profile.  Weed seems to be an equal
opportunity destroyer legally.

> 
> Edg
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <reavismarek@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Why on earth the government hasn't legalized marijuana (at least), 
> > regulated its use and taxed it to provide for needed government 
> > programs puzzles me.
> > 
> > Here in Humboldt County the estimates of how much marijuana 
> > cultivation contributes to our local economy ranges from $200 million 
> > on the conservative side to half-a-billion on the optimistic side.  
> > And that's just a single California county; you can imagine how much 
> > in potential tax revenues that single crop could generate if it was 
> > legalized.
> > 
> > And the savings in law enforcement, probation services, court and 
> > related court services themselves would be tremendous in and of 
> > themselves.  Some portion of revenues could be directed towards drug 
> > education and rehabilitation services for those who become caught up 
> > in drug addiction, though marijuana ain't one of the drugs that 
> > causes problems (outside of its illegality).  And, although there 
> > will always be something of a black market for any desirable product, 
> > the heavy duty criminal element that is drawn to high-risk, high-
> > profit ventures would exit the market.
> > 
> > I don't think that will happen until we have a responsible Republican 
> > administration that will make the argument an economic one; once you 
> > examine current drug laws through that lens I don't believe you can 
> > long endorse this well-intentioned but fundamentally flawed drug war.
> > 
> > **
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm reading a book called Dry Manhattan, Prohibition in New York 
> > City.
> > >  It is such a strong parallel to what is going on now with an
> > > important exception.  Because of the depression, society got sick
> > > really quickly of financing an unwinnable war which creates a 
> > mobster
> > > underground making untaxible billions. The same issues of black 
> > market
> > > impurities causing more health issues than the drug itself happened
> > > back then also with private stills cranking out some nasty stuff.
> > > 
> > > Cry'n Mama, Mama, Mama, cry'n canned heat kill'n me
> > > Cry'n Mama, Mama, Mama, cry'n Sterno is kill'n me
> > > If canned heat don't kill me, I believe I'll never die.
> > > 
> > > Sterno strained through bread was a favorite drink.  Only problem 
> > was
> > > is was wood alcohol, not grain alcohol.  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <reavismarek@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for posting this piece, Bob.  Seeing firsthand how this so-
> > > > called war is fought, at least on the jurisdictional battlefields 
> > I've 
> > > > been in, is a scary eye-opener to just how ineffective and crazy 
> > the 
> > > > whole enterprise is.  One of the very worst examples of how a 
> > good 
> > > > intention goes terribly bad is the asset forfeiture laws that 
> > > > essentially create self-funding task forces that receive 
> > percentages of 
> > > > property and cash seized from drug arrests.
> > > > 
> > > > It makes these multi-agency task forces into freebooters who 
> > profit 
> > > > from their busts.
> > > > 
> > > > **
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@> 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Think the war in Iraq is stupid? The war on drugs is much 
> > dumber:
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://www.slate.com/id/2178795/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to