Bhairitu wrote: > Actually I like Edwards because he would go > after big business as he has all his life from > being a trial lawyer. > You sound pretty mixed up too! But it makes sense when you realize that John Edwards is way mixed up.
According to what I've read, John Edwards co-sponsored Joe Lieberman's 2002 Iraq War Resolution to authorize the use of military force against Iraq. John Edwards got us into the war but he doesn't have a plan to win the war or to get us out of the war, short of retreating! I'd never vote for a mixed up guy like that. If he screwed up on getting us into war, why would I think his plan to get us out of the war wouldn't be a big mistake as well? John Edwards voted to give a big corporation, Halliburton, a billion dollar contract in Iraq. Now that's mixed up! John Edwards: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards "Almost no one disagrees with these basic facts: that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a menace; that he has weapons of mass destruction and that he is doing everything in his power to get nuclear weapons; that he has supported terrorists; that he is a grave threat to the region, to vital allies like Israel, and to the United States; and that he is thwarting the will of the international community and undermining the United Nations' credibility." - John Edwards
